Sustainable geopolymer concrete evaluation using machine learning and PDP analysis: Comparative insights into strength prediction

The imperative to mitigate the carbon emissions associated with cement production has accelerated the development of geopolymer concrete (GPC) as a sustainable alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). This study benchmarks widely used machine learning models (DT, RF, ANN, and LR) for predicting the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and integrates Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) analysis to connect predictions with binder chemistry and curing dynamics. A dataset comprising 400 experimental samples was compiled, incorporating six critical variables: coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), sodium silicate, superplasticizer, and curing temperature. Four ML algorithms Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Linear Regression (LR) were systematically evaluated. The models were trained and tested on 70/30 ratio, with performance assessed using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results indicated that DT outperformed all models, achieving R 2 = 0.97 (training) and 0.94 (testing) with minimal errors (RMSE = 1.85–2.45 MPa, MAE = 1.20–1.70 MPa, MAPE = 0.058–0.118). RF also demonstrated high reliability, R 2 = 0.94, whereas ANN exhibited moderate predictive capacity (R 2 = 0.91-0.89) but was prone to overfitting. LR consistently underperformed (R 2 = 0.88-0.85), reflecting its limitations in capturing the nonlinearities. Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) analysis confirmed that GGBS (Δ = 55 MPa) and curing temperature (Δ = 23 MPa) were the most influential factors, followed by sodium silicate and superplasticizer, whereas excess aggregates reduced CS. This study highlights the practical advantages of tree-based models in AI-driven mix optimization which provides an interpretable and robust framework for sustainable GPC design, thereby promoting the adoption of low-carbon binders in structural applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hybrid Advances
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100569
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable geopolymer concrete evaluation using machine learning and PDP analysis: Comparative insights into strength prediction

Amol Pote, Prashant G Sawarkar, Mukhtar Hamid Abed, Mohammad Khishe et al.
2 citations
Hybrid Advances
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
article

Sustainable geopolymer concrete evaluation using machine learning and PDP analysis: Comparative insights into strength prediction

Amol Pote, Prashant G Sawarkar, Mukhtar Hamid Abed, Mohammad Khishe, Ahmed Adnan Hadi, Mohammad Amir Khan, Aseel Smerat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The imperative to mitigate the carbon emissions associated with cement production has accelerated the development of geopolymer concrete (GPC) as a sustainable alternative to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). This study benchmarks widely used machine learning models (DT, RF, ANN, and LR) for predicting the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete (GPC) and integrates Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) analysis to connect predictions with binder chemistry and curing dynamics. A dataset comprising 400 experimental samples was compiled, incorporating six critical variables: coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), sodium silicate, superplasticizer, and curing temperature. Four ML algorithms Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Linear Regression (LR) were systematically evaluated. The models were trained and tested on 70/30 ratio, with performance assessed using the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results indicated that DT outperformed all models, achieving R 2 = 0.97 (training) and 0.94 (testing) with minimal errors (RMSE = 1.85–2.45 MPa, MAE = 1.20–1.70 MPa, MAPE = 0.058–0.118). RF also demonstrated high reliability, R 2 = 0.94, whereas ANN exhibited moderate predictive capacity (R 2 = 0.91-0.89) but was prone to overfitting. LR consistently underperformed (R 2 = 0.88-0.85), reflecting its limitations in capturing the nonlinearities. Partial Dependence Plot (PDP) analysis confirmed that GGBS (Δ = 55 MPa) and curing temperature (Δ = 23 MPa) were the most influential factors, followed by sodium silicate and superplasticizer, whereas excess aggregates reduced CS. This study highlights the practical advantages of tree-based models in AI-driven mix optimization which provides an interpretable and robust framework for sustainable GPC design, thereby promoting the adoption of low-carbon binders in structural applications.

Hybrid AdvancesVol. 11
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), Applied Science Private University (JO), Galgotias University (IN), Thi Qar University (IQ), Dijlah University College (IQ), Alsalam University College (IQ), Raisoni Group of Institutions (IN), Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.