Simultaneous pursuit of accountability for regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts in artificial intelligence (AI) projects

This exploratory study, grounded in agency theory, employs quantitative analyses to investigate the simultaneous pursuit of accountability for regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts within artificial intelligence (AI) projects.An agent-principal matrix was developed, synthesizing knowledge from the AI stakeholder model into 11 accountability indicators.These indicators establish a standard of responsibility among project actors for regulatory compliance, ethical practices, and financial benefits.Using quantitative methods, we analyzed survey data on accountability and defined the scope of AI systems under development.We identified two clusters of AI systemsautonomous and non-autonomous-based on seven features.We then examined how these two types of systems, as well as the importance of sustainability and fairness, impact the promotion of accountability.Results indicate that accountabilities shift based on the scope of the AI system and the project role.Regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts are not mutually exclusive project goals and coexist.The findings quantify subjective and theoretical speculation about accountabilities within AI projects.Additionally, the study contributes empirical data to the literature on AI, ethics, and project management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15439/2025f6392
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simultaneous pursuit of accountability for regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts in artificial intelligence (AI) projects

Gloria J. Miller
Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Simultaneous pursuit of accountability for regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts in artificial intelligence (AI) projects

Gloria J. Miller
article en

Abstract

This exploratory study, grounded in agency theory, employs quantitative analyses to investigate the simultaneous pursuit of accountability for regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts within artificial intelligence (AI) projects.An agent-principal matrix was developed, synthesizing knowledge from the AI stakeholder model into 11 accountability indicators.These indicators establish a standard of responsibility among project actors for regulatory compliance, ethical practices, and financial benefits.Using quantitative methods, we analyzed survey data on accountability and defined the scope of AI systems under development.We identified two clusters of AI systemsautonomous and non-autonomous-based on seven features.We then examined how these two types of systems, as well as the importance of sustainability and fairness, impact the promotion of accountability.Results indicate that accountabilities shift based on the scope of the AI system and the project role.Regulatory compliance, financial benefits, and societal impacts are not mutually exclusive project goals and coexist.The findings quantify subjective and theoretical speculation about accountabilities within AI projects.Additionally, the study contributes empirical data to the literature on AI, ethics, and project management.

Annals of Computer Science and Information SystemsVol. 43
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.