A Stellar Dynamical Mass for the Central Black Hole in MCG–06-30-15

Abstract We present the stellar dynamical (SD) mass of the central black hole in the nearby Seyfert galaxy MCG–06-30-15 using the Schwarzschild orbit-superposition method implemented in the open-source code FORSTAND . We obtained spatially resolved K -band nuclear stellar spectra for this galaxy with SINFONI on the Very Large Telescope. We extracted the bulk stellar kinematics using Gauss–Hermite (GH) parameterization of the line-of-sight velocity distributions. A multicomponent surface-brightness profile of the galaxy was determined from a Hubble Space Telescope medium-band V image. Our best-fit models indicate a black hole mass of M BH = (4.4 ± 1.4) × 10 7 M ⊙ and a stellar mass-to-light ratio of M / L = (3.0 ± 0.3) M ⊙ / L ⊙ , within 1 σ confidence intervals. Our constraint on M BH agrees with an upper limit on the mass from stellar dynamics based on the Jeans anisotropic modeling method, but is ∼10 times larger than the reported mass from reverberation mapping (RM). However, our best-fit M BH may be systematically biased high due to the counterrotating disk in the nucleus of MCG–06-30-15 and the inability of the GH parameterization to fully describe such a complicated set of stellar kinematics. In addition, a dynamical M BH value depends heavily on the assumed source distance, which is not yet accurately constrained for this galaxy. MCG–06-30-15 is only the fourth galaxy in which we can compare M BH from SD modeling with that from RM. A direct comparison of M BH allows us to identify and investigate the possible sources of bias associated with different mass measurement techniques, which may influence our understanding of black hole and galaxy coevolution across cosmological timescales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae03a8
Primary Topic
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Stellar Dynamical Mass for the Central Black Hole in MCG–06-30-15

Misty C. Bentz, Eugene Vasiliev, M. Vestergaard, S. I. Raimundo et al.
The Astrophysical Journal
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
article

A Stellar Dynamical Mass for the Central Black Hole in MCG–06-30-15

Misty C. Bentz, Eugene Vasiliev, M. Vestergaard, S. I. Raimundo, Christopher A. Onken, Monica Valluri, N.K. Das
article en

Abstract

Abstract We present the stellar dynamical (SD) mass of the central black hole in the nearby Seyfert galaxy MCG–06-30-15 using the Schwarzschild orbit-superposition method implemented in the open-source code FORSTAND . We obtained spatially resolved K -band nuclear stellar spectra for this galaxy with SINFONI on the Very Large Telescope. We extracted the bulk stellar kinematics using Gauss–Hermite (GH) parameterization of the line-of-sight velocity distributions. A multicomponent surface-brightness profile of the galaxy was determined from a Hubble Space Telescope medium-band V image. Our best-fit models indicate a black hole mass of M BH = (4.4 ± 1.4) × 10 7 M ⊙ and a stellar mass-to-light ratio of M / L = (3.0 ± 0.3) M ⊙ / L ⊙ , within 1 σ confidence intervals. Our constraint on M BH agrees with an upper limit on the mass from stellar dynamics based on the Jeans anisotropic modeling method, but is ∼10 times larger than the reported mass from reverberation mapping (RM). However, our best-fit M BH may be systematically biased high due to the counterrotating disk in the nucleus of MCG–06-30-15 and the inability of the GH parameterization to fully describe such a complicated set of stellar kinematics. In addition, a dynamical M BH value depends heavily on the assumed source distance, which is not yet accurately constrained for this galaxy. MCG–06-30-15 is only the fourth galaxy in which we can compare M BH from SD modeling with that from RM. A direct comparison of M BH allows us to identify and investigate the possible sources of bias associated with different mass measurement techniques, which may influence our understanding of black hole and galaxy coevolution across cosmological timescales.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 993(1)
Australian National University (AU), University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Arizona (US), Georgia State University (US), University of Cambridge (GB), University of Michigan (US), University of Surrey (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
National Science Foundation, European Southern Observatory, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.