Assessing Avoided Burden and Net Environmental Impact by Recycling and Repurposing of Retiring Wind Turbines

Wind turbines are reaching end-of-life in increasing volumes, presenting a growing sustainability challenge. In the United States, prevailing waste management practices, primarily landfilling, undermine circular economy objectives by discarding recoverable materials and energy. This study applies life cycle assessment (LCA) to quantify 16 midpoint environmental impacts across three end-of-life pathways—landfilling, recycling, and repurposing—of major turbine components (steel, concrete, and composite blades). An avoided burden approach is used to quantify environmental credits from substituting recovered materials for virgin equivalents. Results show that nearly all recycling and repurposing pathways outperform landfilling across most impact categories. Mechanical recycling of both glass and carbon fiber blades performed better than landfilling in all 16 categories, while pyrolysis and solvolysis improved outcomes in 14–15 of 16 categories (CO2 eq emissions were higher for pyrolysis and solvolysis than for the landfilling option). Repurposing blades likewise showed broad advantages (15 of 16 categories; ozone depletion was slightly higher), extending material lifetimes before waste treatment. For conventional materials, steel and concrete recycling reduced impacts in most categories, with concrete outperforming landfilling in 15 of 16 categories (marine eutrophication was nearly equal to the landfilling option). The only mixed pathway was cement co-processing of GFRP, which split evenly between benefits and burdens. Sensitivity analysis underscores that improving the quality of recovered materials is critical to maximizing environmental benefits. Overall, both recycling and repurposing offer substantial environmental advantages over landfilling, reinforcing the importance of circular end-of-life strategies in sustaining wind energy across its full life cycle.