Comparison of Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Standalone and Pedicle Screw-Fixated Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions

Study Design: Single-institution, multi-surgeon retrospective cohort study. Objective: Compare one-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol 5-D (EQ. 5D) scores between ALIFs with and without pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and identify demographic predictors of outcomes. Summary of Background Data: PSF supplementation of anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF) remains the standard for patients with complex pathology and instability. Standalone ALIF procedures forgo PSF application, minimizing surgical trauma to the posterior anatomy at the expense of construct stability. It is unclear if PSF affects long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients without considerable instability. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 89 who underwent a one-level or two-level ALIF between March 2015 and December 2023 for a diagnosis of disc degeneration, spondylosis, or spinal stenosis were included. Cases were grouped into standalone ALIF (SA-ALIF) or pedicle screw-fixated ALIF (PSF-ALIF) cohorts. Outcomes were assessed with multivariable regression. Backward stepwise multivariable linear regression with listwise deletion identified predictors of one-year PRO scores in each cohort. Results: Analysis included 396 ALIFs with 234 (59.1%) PSF-ALIFs and 162 (40.9%) SA-ALIFs. PSF-ALIF patients were older, with higher BMI and comorbidity burden. Both groups improved significantly in ODI and EQ. 5D scores at one year ( P <0.001). ODI scores did not differ between groups, but PSF-ALIFs had higher one-year EQ. 5D scores (75.7±18.8 vs. 67.8±19.5, P =0.007) and improvement from baseline (18.5±16.7 vs. 13.9±19.1, P =0.013). Among PSF-ALIFs, higher CCI predicted improved ODI scores ( P =0.010). In SA-ALIFs, smoking predicted worse ODI ( P =0.021) and EQ. 5D ( P =0.012), and higher BMI predicted worse EQ. 5D ( P =0.039). Conclusions: Supplementation with pedicle screws can increase the quality of life of ALIF patients with stable degenerative pathology. PSF may be beneficial for active smokers and those of higher BMI, but may be limiting for healthier patients. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine Open
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/bn9.0000000000000009
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Standalone and Pedicle Screw-Fixated Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions

Ekrem Ayhan, Laura Sanzari, Aris Yannopoulos, Thomas Giannasca
Spine Open
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Comparison of Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Standalone and Pedicle Screw-Fixated Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions

Ekrem Ayhan, Laura Sanzari, Aris Yannopoulos, Thomas Giannasca
article en

Abstract

Study Design: Single-institution, multi-surgeon retrospective cohort study. Objective: Compare one-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQol 5-D (EQ. 5D) scores between ALIFs with and without pedicle screw fixation (PSF) and identify demographic predictors of outcomes. Summary of Background Data: PSF supplementation of anterior lumbar interbody fusions (ALIF) remains the standard for patients with complex pathology and instability. Standalone ALIF procedures forgo PSF application, minimizing surgical trauma to the posterior anatomy at the expense of construct stability. It is unclear if PSF affects long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients without considerable instability. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 89 who underwent a one-level or two-level ALIF between March 2015 and December 2023 for a diagnosis of disc degeneration, spondylosis, or spinal stenosis were included. Cases were grouped into standalone ALIF (SA-ALIF) or pedicle screw-fixated ALIF (PSF-ALIF) cohorts. Outcomes were assessed with multivariable regression. Backward stepwise multivariable linear regression with listwise deletion identified predictors of one-year PRO scores in each cohort. Results: Analysis included 396 ALIFs with 234 (59.1%) PSF-ALIFs and 162 (40.9%) SA-ALIFs. PSF-ALIF patients were older, with higher BMI and comorbidity burden. Both groups improved significantly in ODI and EQ. 5D scores at one year ( P <0.001). ODI scores did not differ between groups, but PSF-ALIFs had higher one-year EQ. 5D scores (75.7±18.8 vs. 67.8±19.5, P =0.007) and improvement from baseline (18.5±16.7 vs. 13.9±19.1, P =0.013). Among PSF-ALIFs, higher CCI predicted improved ODI scores ( P =0.010). In SA-ALIFs, smoking predicted worse ODI ( P =0.021) and EQ. 5D ( P =0.012), and higher BMI predicted worse EQ. 5D ( P =0.039). Conclusions: Supplementation with pedicle screws can increase the quality of life of ALIF patients with stable degenerative pathology. PSF may be beneficial for active smokers and those of higher BMI, but may be limiting for healthier patients. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Spine OpenVol. 1(2)
Joint Replacement Institute (US), St. Francis Hospital (US), Quinnipiac University (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.