A-calibration: assessment of prediction models for survival data under censoring

Advantages of A-calibration compared to D-calibration have been demonstrated through theoretical considerations, a simulation study, and a case study, while no disadvantages relative to D-calibration were identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02671-6
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A-calibration: assessment of prediction models for survival data under censoring

Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Rasmus Waagepetersen
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

A-calibration: assessment of prediction models for survival data under censoring

Mikkel Runason Simonsen, Rasmus Waagepetersen
article en

Abstract

Advantages of A-calibration compared to D-calibration have been demonstrated through theoretical considerations, a simulation study, and a case study, while no disadvantages relative to D-calibration were identified.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 25(1)
Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Villum Fonden, Novo Nordisk, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.