Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers

Transgene-free genome editing of the gene of interest in citrus and poplar has been achieved by co-editing the ALS gene via transient transgene expression of an efficient cytosine base editor. CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems have been widely used in plants. However, such genome-edited plants are nearly always transgenic in the first generation when Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is used. Transgene-free genome-edited plants are valuable for genetic analysis and breeding as well as simplifying regulatory approval. It can be challenging to generate transgene-free genome-edited plants in vegetatively propagated or perennial plants. To advance transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar, we investigated a co-editing strategy using an efficient cytosine base editor (CBE) to edit the ALS gene to confer herbicide resistance combined with transient transgene expression and potential mobile RNA-based movement of CBE transcripts to neighboring, non-transgenic cells. An FCY-UPP based cytotoxin system was used to select non-transgenic plants that survive after culturing on 5-FC containing medium. While the editing efficiency is higher in poplar than in citrus, our results show that the CBE-based co-editing strategy works in both citrus and poplar, albeit with low efficiency for biallelic edits. Unexpectedly, the addition of the TLS mobile RNA sequence reduced genome editing efficiency in both transgenic and non-transgenic plants. Although a small fraction of escaping plants is detected in both positive and negative selection processes, our data demonstrate a promising approach for generating transgene-free base-edited plants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Cell Reports
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-025-03627-2
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers

Gary D. Coleman, Alessandra Alves de Souza, James N. Culver, Danyel Fernandes Contiliani et al.
Plant Cell Reports
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers

Gary D. Coleman, Alessandra Alves de Souza, James N. Culver, Danyel Fernandes Contiliani, Rushil Mandlik, Yiping Qi, Gen Li, Dhiôvanna Corrêia Rocha, Miracle Osazee Omoregbee, Juliet Mascoveto, Daniel Rodriguez Leal
article en

Abstract

Transgene-free genome editing of the gene of interest in citrus and poplar has been achieved by co-editing the ALS gene via transient transgene expression of an efficient cytosine base editor. CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems have been widely used in plants. However, such genome-edited plants are nearly always transgenic in the first generation when Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is used. Transgene-free genome-edited plants are valuable for genetic analysis and breeding as well as simplifying regulatory approval. It can be challenging to generate transgene-free genome-edited plants in vegetatively propagated or perennial plants. To advance transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar, we investigated a co-editing strategy using an efficient cytosine base editor (CBE) to edit the ALS gene to confer herbicide resistance combined with transient transgene expression and potential mobile RNA-based movement of CBE transcripts to neighboring, non-transgenic cells. An FCY-UPP based cytotoxin system was used to select non-transgenic plants that survive after culturing on 5-FC containing medium. While the editing efficiency is higher in poplar than in citrus, our results show that the CBE-based co-editing strategy works in both citrus and poplar, albeit with low efficiency for biallelic edits. Unexpectedly, the addition of the TLS mobile RNA sequence reduced genome editing efficiency in both transgenic and non-transgenic plants. Although a small fraction of escaping plants is detected in both positive and negative selection processes, our data demonstrate a promising approach for generating transgene-free base-edited plants.

Plant Cell ReportsVol. 44(11)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Advanced Bioscience Laboratories (United States) (US), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR), Institute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park (US), IAC (United States) (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.