Methylation differences between assisted reproductive technology-conceived and naturally conceived children near <i>BRCA1</i> and <i>NBR2</i>

Recent studies have shown that newborns conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) exhibited significantly different DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles at birth compared to those conceived naturally. Of note was the observation of increased DNAm at the promoter region of <i>BRCA1/NBR2</i> in ART-conceived newborns. However, it remains unclear if these DNAm differences persist after birth. Using the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), a large-scale population-based pregnancy cohort with extensive longitudinal data collected through biological samples and questionnaires, we generated longitudinal DNAm data for 105 ART-conceived and 250 naturally conceived children at birth and at ages 3-22 years. DNAm differences in the <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>NBR2</i> promoter between ART- and naturally conceived children, at birth and postnatally, were tested using linear mixed model with adjustment for maternal and newborn covariates. While ART-conceived children showed subtle hypermethylation at birth and postnatally, the differences diminished over time and did not remain statistically significant after multiple testing correction. Our findings suggest that subtle hypermethylation at the <i>BRCA1/NBR2</i> promoter in ART-conceived children may represent an ART-associated epigenetic signature, although further studies in larger populations are needed to clarify its persistence and significance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epigenetics
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2025.2577188
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methylation differences between assisted reproductive technology-conceived and naturally conceived children near BRCA1 and NBR2

Per Magnus, Robert Lyle, Jon Bohlin, Siri E. Håberg et al.
Epigenetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Methylation differences between assisted reproductive technology-conceived and naturally conceived children near BRCA1 and NBR2

Per Magnus, Robert Lyle, Jon Bohlin, Siri E. Håberg, Håkon K. Gjessing, Christian M. Page, Yunsung Lee
article en

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that newborns conceived using assisted reproductive technology (ART) exhibited significantly different DNA methylation (DNAm) profiles at birth compared to those conceived naturally. Of note was the observation of increased DNAm at the promoter region of <i>BRCA1/NBR2</i> in ART-conceived newborns. However, it remains unclear if these DNAm differences persist after birth. Using the Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child Cohort Study (MoBa), a large-scale population-based pregnancy cohort with extensive longitudinal data collected through biological samples and questionnaires, we generated longitudinal DNAm data for 105 ART-conceived and 250 naturally conceived children at birth and at ages 3-22 years. DNAm differences in the <i>BRCA1</i>/<i>NBR2</i> promoter between ART- and naturally conceived children, at birth and postnatally, were tested using linear mixed model with adjustment for maternal and newborn covariates. While ART-conceived children showed subtle hypermethylation at birth and postnatally, the differences diminished over time and did not remain statistically significant after multiple testing correction. Our findings suggest that subtle hypermethylation at the <i>BRCA1/NBR2</i> promoter in ART-conceived children may represent an ART-associated epigenetic signature, although further studies in larger populations are needed to clarify its persistence and significance.

EpigeneticsVol. 20(1)
Oslo University Hospital (NO), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.