On Selection of Cross‐Section Averages in Non‐Stationary Environments

ABSTRACT Information criteria (ICs) have been widely used in factor models to estimate an unknown number of latent factors. It has recently been shown that ICs perform well in Common Correlated Effects (CCE) and related settings when selecting a set of cross‐section averages (CAs) sufficient for the factor space under stationary factors. As CAs can proxy non‐stationary factors, it is tempting to claim an excellent performance of ICs under general factors, too. We show formally and in simulations that they remain consistent, but the more persistent factors are, the poorer they perform in small samples, which goes against the sentiment in the CCE/CAs literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Time Series Analysis
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.70027
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Selection of Cross‐Section Averages in Non‐Stationary Environments

Ovidijus Stauskas, Jan Ditzen
1 citations
Journal of Time Series Analysis
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
article

On Selection of Cross‐Section Averages in Non‐Stationary Environments

Ovidijus Stauskas, Jan Ditzen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Information criteria (ICs) have been widely used in factor models to estimate an unknown number of latent factors. It has recently been shown that ICs perform well in Common Correlated Effects (CCE) and related settings when selecting a set of cross‐section averages (CAs) sufficient for the factor space under stationary factors. As CAs can proxy non‐stationary factors, it is tempting to claim an excellent performance of ICs under general factors, too. We show formally and in simulations that they remain consistent, but the more persistent factors are, the poorer they perform in small samples, which goes against the sentiment in the CCE/CAs literature.

Journal of Time Series Analysis
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT), BI Norwegian Business School (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.