A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of blended learning and traditional teaching in a multidisciplinary context

This study examines the evolution of blended learning in China, anchored in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Small Private Online Courses (SPOCs), and evaluates its effects on teaching quality, ethics education, and student satisfaction. Combining literature review and quantitative analysis, the research demonstrates that blended learning surpasses traditional pedagogy across these three dimensions—a finding further validated through follow-up interviews. However, students identified notable limitations, including a tendency for online content to foster passive learning and challenges for instructors in classroom management. To address these issues, the paper proposes that educators prioritize content coherence in course design and incorporate student feedback on platform usability to optimize both pedagogical effectiveness and learning outcomes. Future studies should investigate the cost-efficacy of blended learning, specifically its capacity to sustain or elevate educational standards with reduced instructional resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1659590
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of blended learning and traditional teaching in a multidisciplinary context

Wenxuan Ren, Rui Wang, Xiaoyan Zhao, Jingjing Shi
Frontiers in Education
Online and Blended Learning
article

A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of blended learning and traditional teaching in a multidisciplinary context

Wenxuan Ren, Rui Wang, Xiaoyan Zhao, Jingjing Shi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the evolution of blended learning in China, anchored in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and Small Private Online Courses (SPOCs), and evaluates its effects on teaching quality, ethics education, and student satisfaction. Combining literature review and quantitative analysis, the research demonstrates that blended learning surpasses traditional pedagogy across these three dimensions—a finding further validated through follow-up interviews. However, students identified notable limitations, including a tendency for online content to foster passive learning and challenges for instructors in classroom management. To address these issues, the paper proposes that educators prioritize content coherence in course design and incorporate student feedback on platform usability to optimize both pedagogical effectiveness and learning outcomes. Future studies should investigate the cost-efficacy of blended learning, specifically its capacity to sustain or elevate educational standards with reduced instructional resources.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Zhejiang Ocean University (CN), Taizhou Vocational and Technical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of blended learning and traditional teaching in a multidisciplinary context — Wenxuan Ren, Rui Wang, et al. · Frontiers in Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS