Governance of agricultural wastewater management in Japan and South Africa: a comparative institutional analysis

Abstract Effective wastewater management in agriculture is critical for protecting water resources, ensuring food security, and maintaining ecosystem health. However, many countries face persistent challenges in meeting wastewater policy goals due to institutional, regulatory, and technological limitations. This study aims to examine how different governance and infrastructure contexts shape the implementation of agricultural wastewater management strategies. Using the New Institutional Economics (NIE) framework and a comparative case study approach, we analyze Japan and South Africa—two countries that experience significant agricultural wastewater challenges but differ substantially in water availability, agrochemical use, infrastructure capacity, and socio-economic development. These differences provide a valuable basis for exploring context-sensitive governance responses across diverse settings. Our findings show that Japan’s structured coordination and sustained investment in technology support large-scale, sustainable wastewater management. In contrast, South Africa’s infrastructure constraints and resource disparities have encouraged low-cost, community-driven innovations that demonstrate adaptability under resource-scarce conditions. The study concludes that strengthening multi-stakeholder collaboration, clarifying institutional roles, and tailoring governance mechanisms to local capacities are critical for improving wastewater policy outcomes. Cross-country learning offers further promise: South Africa’s grassroots innovations illustrate the potential of decentralized, low-cost approaches, while Japan’s institutional coherence provides transferable insights for systemic reform. Together, the findings make the case that collaborative and decentralized governance—anchored in local realities and informed by mutual learning across contexts—offers a cost-effective pathway to sustainable agricultural wastewater management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Water Resources Management
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-025-01297-2
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance of agricultural wastewater management in Japan and South Africa: a comparative institutional analysis

Daiju Narita, Pyemo Afego, Ifedotun Victor Aina, Kazuki Motohashi et al.
Sustainable Water Resources Management
Water resources management and optimization
article

Governance of agricultural wastewater management in Japan and South Africa: a comparative institutional analysis

Daiju Narita, Pyemo Afego, Ifedotun Victor Aina, Kazuki Motohashi, Djiby Thiam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Effective wastewater management in agriculture is critical for protecting water resources, ensuring food security, and maintaining ecosystem health. However, many countries face persistent challenges in meeting wastewater policy goals due to institutional, regulatory, and technological limitations. This study aims to examine how different governance and infrastructure contexts shape the implementation of agricultural wastewater management strategies. Using the New Institutional Economics (NIE) framework and a comparative case study approach, we analyze Japan and South Africa—two countries that experience significant agricultural wastewater challenges but differ substantially in water availability, agrochemical use, infrastructure capacity, and socio-economic development. These differences provide a valuable basis for exploring context-sensitive governance responses across diverse settings. Our findings show that Japan’s structured coordination and sustained investment in technology support large-scale, sustainable wastewater management. In contrast, South Africa’s infrastructure constraints and resource disparities have encouraged low-cost, community-driven innovations that demonstrate adaptability under resource-scarce conditions. The study concludes that strengthening multi-stakeholder collaboration, clarifying institutional roles, and tailoring governance mechanisms to local capacities are critical for improving wastewater policy outcomes. Cross-country learning offers further promise: South Africa’s grassroots innovations illustrate the potential of decentralized, low-cost approaches, while Japan’s institutional coherence provides transferable insights for systemic reform. Together, the findings make the case that collaborative and decentralized governance—anchored in local realities and informed by mutual learning across contexts—offers a cost-effective pathway to sustainable agricultural wastewater management.

Sustainable Water Resources ManagementVol. 11(6)
Hitotsubashi University (JP), University of Cape Town (ZA), Tokyo University of the Arts (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
National Research Foundation, University of Tokyo, Japan Science and Technology Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.