Bi-functional integrin degraders cause stronger anti-proliferative effects than a blocking antibody by modulating distinct downstream signaling

Integrins play a critical role in signaling events that regulate cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation, processes that, when dysregulated, contribute to cancer progression. Recently, innovative approaches that target extracellular proteins for degradation have suggested potential in cancer treatment by removing specific cell surface receptors and trafficking them to the lysosome for breakdown. In this context, two integrin degraders were engineered, each exploiting different lysosomal targeting pathways: the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) and zinc and ring finger 3 (ZNRF3), respectively. Both degraders use a pan-selective human αv antibody that fully blocks ligand binding, effectively internalizing and degrading αv integrins <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. Degrading cell-surface αv integrins, rather than merely blocking their interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM), produces a stronger anti-proliferative effect by more robustly modulating oncogenic signaling pathways. Notably, these degraders exploit distinct mechanisms, including the first reporting of more profound changes in tumor-promoting integrin signaling cascades compared to ligand blocking alone, highlighting a novel avenue for integrin-targeted drug development. This strategy leads to greater suppression of tumor cell growth making it a promising and potentially superior approach to cancer therapy. Similar to other reports, <i>in vivo</i> efficacy has yet to be shown with extracellular or membrane-targeted protein degraders. Through careful pharmacokinetics characterizations, we showed that lack of <i>in vivo</i> efficacy may be due to insufficient exposure and target engagement. Our study provides useful lessons for the field to fully realize the full potential for the next generation of degrader therapeutics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mAbs
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2025.2575849
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bi-functional integrin degraders cause stronger anti-proliferative effects than a blocking antibody by modulating distinct downstream signaling

Zhaohui Sunny Zhou, Meghan Monroy, Megan Krumpoch, T. Andrew McTeague et al.
3 citations
mAbs
Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
4.87
article

Bi-functional integrin degraders cause stronger anti-proliferative effects than a blocking antibody by modulating distinct downstream signaling

Zhaohui Sunny Zhou, Meghan Monroy, Megan Krumpoch, T. Andrew McTeague, Fu‐Yang Lin, Dooyoung Lee, Angela Fee
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Integrins play a critical role in signaling events that regulate cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation, processes that, when dysregulated, contribute to cancer progression. Recently, innovative approaches that target extracellular proteins for degradation have suggested potential in cancer treatment by removing specific cell surface receptors and trafficking them to the lysosome for breakdown. In this context, two integrin degraders were engineered, each exploiting different lysosomal targeting pathways: the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) and zinc and ring finger 3 (ZNRF3), respectively. Both degraders use a pan-selective human αv antibody that fully blocks ligand binding, effectively internalizing and degrading αv integrins <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. Degrading cell-surface αv integrins, rather than merely blocking their interactions with the extracellular matrix (ECM), produces a stronger anti-proliferative effect by more robustly modulating oncogenic signaling pathways. Notably, these degraders exploit distinct mechanisms, including the first reporting of more profound changes in tumor-promoting integrin signaling cascades compared to ligand blocking alone, highlighting a novel avenue for integrin-targeted drug development. This strategy leads to greater suppression of tumor cell growth making it a promising and potentially superior approach to cancer therapy. Similar to other reports, <i>in vivo</i> efficacy has yet to be shown with extracellular or membrane-targeted protein degraders. Through careful pharmacokinetics characterizations, we showed that lack of <i>in vivo</i> efficacy may be due to insufficient exposure and target engagement. Our study provides useful lessons for the field to fully realize the full potential for the next generation of degrader therapeutics.

mAbsVol. 17(1)
Northeastern University (US), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), Universidad del Noreste (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
4.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.