Infiltration, interdiction, and other covert supply chain operations: a research agenda

Purpose The masterminds behind covert supply chain operations aim to hide their activities from government agencies and society at large, often for illegal gains or to intentionally cause harm. This conceptual article outlines a research agenda for future studies by framing covert supply chain activities and the countermeasures used to disrupt them. Design/methodology/approach Secondary data were collected from various news sources (observation) and analyzed to understand the nature of covert supply chain operations and efforts to identify and disrupt them (conceptualization). Findings To date, covert supply chain operations and counter-operations categories have been scarcely scrutinized in the supply chain literature, and our framework presents many fruitful avenues for further research. Practical implications Policymakers may aim to enhance the visibility of covert supply chains to achieve strategic objectives. Our framework enables logistics providers, network orchestrators, and shippers to identify vulnerabilities and detect covert infiltration by hostile actors within customer supply networks. Originality/value The mainstream supply chain literature has viewed supply chains of illegal goods and disruptive counter-operations as piecemeal. This conceptual article addresses the topic holistically to create a framework for guiding future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-02-2025-0115
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infiltration, interdiction, and other covert supply chain operations: a research agenda

Martin C. Schleper, Samuel Roscoe, Jens K. Roehrich, ManMohan S. Sodhi et al.
3 citations
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
6.68
article

Infiltration, interdiction, and other covert supply chain operations: a research agenda

Martin C. Schleper, Samuel Roscoe, Jens K. Roehrich, ManMohan S. Sodhi, Robert Handfield, Christopher S. Tang, Lisa M. Ellram, Joseph Sarkis
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose The masterminds behind covert supply chain operations aim to hide their activities from government agencies and society at large, often for illegal gains or to intentionally cause harm. This conceptual article outlines a research agenda for future studies by framing covert supply chain activities and the countermeasures used to disrupt them. Design/methodology/approach Secondary data were collected from various news sources (observation) and analyzed to understand the nature of covert supply chain operations and efforts to identify and disrupt them (conceptualization). Findings To date, covert supply chain operations and counter-operations categories have been scarcely scrutinized in the supply chain literature, and our framework presents many fruitful avenues for further research. Practical implications Policymakers may aim to enhance the visibility of covert supply chains to achieve strategic objectives. Our framework enables logistics providers, network orchestrators, and shippers to identify vulnerabilities and detect covert infiltration by hostile actors within customer supply networks. Originality/value The mainstream supply chain literature has viewed supply chains of illegal goods and disruptive counter-operations as piecemeal. This conceptual article addresses the topic holistically to create a framework for guiding future research.

International Journal of Operations & Production ManagementVol. 45(13)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US), NEOMA Business School (FR), University of Miami (US), Thompson Rivers University (CA), St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), Smolensk State University (RU), Université Pédagogique Nationale (CD), Hanken School of Economics (FI), University of Bath (GB), Anderson University - South Carolina (US), Miami University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.