Toward a shared vision for climate‐informed resource stewardship

Climate‐change adaptation planning processes and tools are increasing in number and evolving rapidly. During times of innovation and proliferation, a potential danger is incoherence, when well‐intended contributions can overwhelm, create confusion, or mask complementarities. A shared vision is needed to avoid duplication, reduce misunderstandings, and facilitate work across jurisdictions to steward resources undergoing profound changes. Such a vision would document fundamental tools and approaches while allowing flexibility to match highly varied management contexts and organizational missions. Fortunately, the preconditions for coherence exist. Here, we illustrate how climate‐change adaptation tools—including scenario planning, conceptual frameworks, structured decision making, and impact‐evaluation methods—can be (and are) used in tandem to support adaptation planning that accounts for uncertainty, considers a broad range of strategies and actions, makes transparent and robust choices, evaluates outcomes, and is flexible and responsive to the decision context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a shared vision for climate‐informed resource stewardship

David Lawrence, Brian W. Miller, Mitchell J. Eaton, Maria K. Janowiak et al.
1 citations
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
article

Toward a shared vision for climate‐informed resource stewardship

David Lawrence, Brian W. Miller, Mitchell J. Eaton, Maria K. Janowiak, Leslie A. Brandt, Aparna Bamzai‐Dodson, Lindsey L. Thurman, Shelley D. Crausbay, Gregor W. Schuurman, Julian Reyes, Wylie Carr, Molly S. Cross, D. Todd Jones‐Farrand
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate‐change adaptation planning processes and tools are increasing in number and evolving rapidly. During times of innovation and proliferation, a potential danger is incoherence, when well‐intended contributions can overwhelm, create confusion, or mask complementarities. A shared vision is needed to avoid duplication, reduce misunderstandings, and facilitate work across jurisdictions to steward resources undergoing profound changes. Such a vision would document fundamental tools and approaches while allowing flexibility to match highly varied management contexts and organizational missions. Fortunately, the preconditions for coherence exist. Here, we illustrate how climate‐change adaptation tools—including scenario planning, conceptual frameworks, structured decision making, and impact‐evaluation methods—can be (and are) used in tandem to support adaptation planning that accounts for uncertainty, considers a broad range of strategies and actions, makes transparent and robust choices, evaluates outcomes, and is flexible and responsive to the decision context.

Frontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentVol. 23(10)
United States Geological Survey (US), Bureau of Land Management (US), National Park Service (US), US Forest Service (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), Northern Research Station (US), Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center (US), Rocky Mountain Research Station (US), North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Forest Service, National Park Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.