Imagining Communities: Story Listening and Popular Politics in Ottoman Urban Centers, ∼1780–1830

Abstract Listening to stories was the most common leisure activity in early modern Ottoman coffeehouses. This article examines this practice as a form of guided, collective imagination and explores its political significance from the 1780s to the 1830s, a period of rising tensions and direct confrontations between the palace and the Janissary army. It argues that among the Janissaries, who gathered regularly in coffeehouses, story listening helped sustain a shared identity grounded in virility, comradeship, and heterodox religious sensibilities, all of which were central to their political activism. The Janissaries were an “imagining community:” not only did they see themselves as a distinct social body, but their sense of community was continually reinforced through acts of co-imagining—visualizing and experiencing narratives together.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social History
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jsh/shaf092
Primary Topic
Ottoman Empire History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imagining Communities: Story Listening and Popular Politics in Ottoman Urban Centers, ∼1780–1830

Avner Wishnitzer
Journal of Social History
Ottoman Empire History and Society
article

Imagining Communities: Story Listening and Popular Politics in Ottoman Urban Centers, ∼1780–1830

Avner Wishnitzer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Listening to stories was the most common leisure activity in early modern Ottoman coffeehouses. This article examines this practice as a form of guided, collective imagination and explores its political significance from the 1780s to the 1830s, a period of rising tensions and direct confrontations between the palace and the Janissary army. It argues that among the Janissaries, who gathered regularly in coffeehouses, story listening helped sustain a shared identity grounded in virility, comradeship, and heterodox religious sensibilities, all of which were central to their political activism. The Janissaries were an “imagining community:” not only did they see themselves as a distinct social body, but their sense of community was continually reinforced through acts of co-imagining—visualizing and experiencing narratives together.

Journal of Social History
Binghamton University
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ottoman Empire History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.