Does Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty Technology Have Any Benefit in Achieving Equal Limb Length via the Direct Anterior Approach?

Background Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common and clinically significant complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA), potentially affecting functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Robotic-assisted THA has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional techniques, offering enhanced precision in implant positioning. This study aims to evaluate whether robotic-assisted THA via the direct anterior approach provides significant advantages in achieving equal limb length compared to conventional techniques. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted among 200 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA via the direct anterior approach from February 2018 to August 2024. Of these, 100 patients underwent robotic-assisted THA, and 100 underwent conventional THA. Postoperative leg length measurements were obtained using standardized radiographs, and LLD was classified into mild (<5 mm), moderate (5-10 mm), and severe (>10 mm). Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and analysis of covariance, were performed to compare LLD between the two groups while adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). Results The robotic-assisted group demonstrated a significantly lower mean LLD compared to the conventional group (4.05 mm vs. 6.0 mm; p = 0.001). After adjusting for age and BMI, the difference remained significant (adjusted mean difference = -1.84 mm, 95% confidence interval = 0.638-3.03; p = 0.003). The rates of moderate-to-severe LLD were 55% in the conventional group and 44% in the robotic-assisted group, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Conclusions Robotic-assisted THA via the direct anterior approach significantly reduces the magnitude of LLD compared to conventional techniques while achieving similar efficacy in minimizing severe discrepancies. These findings highlight the potential benefits of robotic assistance in optimizing surgical precision, though further research is needed to justify its cost-effectiveness and impact on long-term functional outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.92716
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty Technology Have Any Benefit in Achieving Equal Limb Length via the Direct Anterior Approach?

Mustapha Modu Gofama, Javad Parvizi, İbrahim Tuncay, Agir Muzaffer
Cureus
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Does Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty Technology Have Any Benefit in Achieving Equal Limb Length via the Direct Anterior Approach?

Mustapha Modu Gofama, Javad Parvizi, İbrahim Tuncay, Agir Muzaffer
article en

Abstract

Background Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common and clinically significant complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA), potentially affecting functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Robotic-assisted THA has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional techniques, offering enhanced precision in implant positioning. This study aims to evaluate whether robotic-assisted THA via the direct anterior approach provides significant advantages in achieving equal limb length compared to conventional techniques. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted among 200 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA via the direct anterior approach from February 2018 to August 2024. Of these, 100 patients underwent robotic-assisted THA, and 100 underwent conventional THA. Postoperative leg length measurements were obtained using standardized radiographs, and LLD was classified into mild (<5 mm), moderate (5-10 mm), and severe (>10 mm). Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and analysis of covariance, were performed to compare LLD between the two groups while adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). Results The robotic-assisted group demonstrated a significantly lower mean LLD compared to the conventional group (4.05 mm vs. 6.0 mm; p = 0.001). After adjusting for age and BMI, the difference remained significant (adjusted mean difference = -1.84 mm, 95% confidence interval = 0.638-3.03; p = 0.003). The rates of moderate-to-severe LLD were 55% in the conventional group and 44% in the robotic-assisted group, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Conclusions Robotic-assisted THA via the direct anterior approach significantly reduces the magnitude of LLD compared to conventional techniques while achieving similar efficacy in minimizing severe discrepancies. These findings highlight the potential benefits of robotic assistance in optimizing surgical precision, though further research is needed to justify its cost-effectiveness and impact on long-term functional outcomes.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Acıbadem University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.