Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial on reducing sedentary behaviour and its effects on quality of life and wellbeing

High sedentary behaviour (SB) associates with poorer wellbeing among adults at increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of reducing SB on perceived quality of life, depressive symptoms, stress, and workability among physically inactive adults with metabolic syndrome. Sixty-four sedentary, inactive adults [58 (SD 7) years old, 58% women, BMI 32 (4) kg/m<sup>2</sup>] with metabolic syndrome were randomised into the intervention (n = 33) and control (n = 31) groups. The 6-month intervention aimed at reducing SB by 1 h/day without adding exercise, while the control group kept their usual SB. All participants wore accelerometers throughout the study to monitor SB and physical activity. Health-related quality of life, stress, depressive symptoms and workability were assessed at baseline, at three months, and after the intervention using the RAND-36, perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ), general health questionnaire (GHQ-12), and the workability score. Main intervention effects were analysed using linear mixed models for repeated measurements. The RAND-36 vitality score decreased in the control group [-2.9 (95% CI -7.7, 1.9) and -1.0 (-5.9, 4.0) from baseline to three and six months, respectively] and increased in the intervention group [+5.7 (1.1, 10.4) and +5.3 (0.4, 10.3) from baseline to three and six months, respectively; between-group difference at three months p = 0.012 and at six months p = 0.079]. The PSQ index increased among all participants [+0.03 (-0.01, 0.06) from baseline to six months; time p = 0.033, no significant between-group differences p = 0.143]. Among all participants, the change in SB correlated negatively with the change in RAND-36 social functioning score, and the change in light physical activity correlated negatively with the change in PSQ index. Moreover, the change in SB breaks correlated negatively with the RAND-36 physical and social functioning scores. Aiming to reduce SB by 1 h/day may increase perceived vitality among physically inactive adults with metabolic syndrome.The study was pre-registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (5/4/2017, NCT03101228).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20836-7
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial on reducing sedentary behaviour and its effects on quality of life and wellbeing

Noora Houttu, Jooa Norha, Tommi Juhani Vasankari, Saara Laine et al.
Scientific Reports
Physical Activity and Health
article

Secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial on reducing sedentary behaviour and its effects on quality of life and wellbeing

Noora Houttu, Jooa Norha, Tommi Juhani Vasankari, Saara Laine, Henri Vähä‐Ypyä, Taru Garthwaite, Eliisa Löyttyniemi, Kirsi Laitinen, Ilkka Heinonen, Juhani Knuuti, Kari K. Kalliokoski, Tanja Sjöros, Harri Sievänen
article en

Abstract

High sedentary behaviour (SB) associates with poorer wellbeing among adults at increased cardiovascular risk. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of reducing SB on perceived quality of life, depressive symptoms, stress, and workability among physically inactive adults with metabolic syndrome. Sixty-four sedentary, inactive adults [58 (SD 7) years old, 58% women, BMI 32 (4) kg/m<sup>2</sup>] with metabolic syndrome were randomised into the intervention (n = 33) and control (n = 31) groups. The 6-month intervention aimed at reducing SB by 1 h/day without adding exercise, while the control group kept their usual SB. All participants wore accelerometers throughout the study to monitor SB and physical activity. Health-related quality of life, stress, depressive symptoms and workability were assessed at baseline, at three months, and after the intervention using the RAND-36, perceived stress questionnaire (PSQ), general health questionnaire (GHQ-12), and the workability score. Main intervention effects were analysed using linear mixed models for repeated measurements. The RAND-36 vitality score decreased in the control group [-2.9 (95% CI -7.7, 1.9) and -1.0 (-5.9, 4.0) from baseline to three and six months, respectively] and increased in the intervention group [+5.7 (1.1, 10.4) and +5.3 (0.4, 10.3) from baseline to three and six months, respectively; between-group difference at three months p = 0.012 and at six months p = 0.079]. The PSQ index increased among all participants [+0.03 (-0.01, 0.06) from baseline to six months; time p = 0.033, no significant between-group differences p = 0.143]. Among all participants, the change in SB correlated negatively with the change in RAND-36 social functioning score, and the change in light physical activity correlated negatively with the change in PSQ index. Moreover, the change in SB breaks correlated negatively with the RAND-36 physical and social functioning scores. Aiming to reduce SB by 1 h/day may increase perceived vitality among physically inactive adults with metabolic syndrome.The study was pre-registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (5/4/2017, NCT03101228).

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Turku (FI), Turku University of Applied Sciences (FI), Tampere University (FI), Turku University Hospital (FI), Turku PET Centre (FI), Tampere University (FI), Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute (FI)
Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, Suomen Kulttuurirahasto, Juho Vainion Säätiö, Päivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö, Turun Yliopisto, Varsinais-Suomen Sairaanhoitopiiri, Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala, Diabetestutkimussäätiö, Turun Yliopistosäätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.