Institutional and organisational myths: A process model of myth lifecycle

In this article, we explore the dynamic role of myths in organisational life, focusing on their creation, evolution and influence. We present a recursive process model that integrates two distinct perspectives from the organisational storytelling and institutional theory literatures, which have historically developed with minimal interaction. Our model outlines the lifecycle of two myth types – localised myths, rooted in specific contexts, and rational myths, embedded in institutional frameworks – and examines how they are created, disseminated and transformed. We highlight key mechanisms such as reenactment, rationalisation, and depersonalisation, which drive the transition from localised to rational myths. By bridging these perspectives, we provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how myths shape organisational culture, identity, and legitimacy, while influencing broader societal narratives. This contribution deepens the dialogue between storytelling and institutional theory. JEL Classification: M10

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962251383119
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Institutional and organisational myths: A process model of myth lifecycle

Jaco Lok, Max Ganzin, Diana Ivanycheva
Australian Journal of Management
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Institutional and organisational myths: A process model of myth lifecycle

Jaco Lok, Max Ganzin, Diana Ivanycheva
article en

Abstract

In this article, we explore the dynamic role of myths in organisational life, focusing on their creation, evolution and influence. We present a recursive process model that integrates two distinct perspectives from the organisational storytelling and institutional theory literatures, which have historically developed with minimal interaction. Our model outlines the lifecycle of two myth types – localised myths, rooted in specific contexts, and rational myths, embedded in institutional frameworks – and examines how they are created, disseminated and transformed. We highlight key mechanisms such as reenactment, rationalisation, and depersonalisation, which drive the transition from localised to rational myths. By bridging these perspectives, we provide a comprehensive framework for understanding how myths shape organisational culture, identity, and legitimacy, while influencing broader societal narratives. This contribution deepens the dialogue between storytelling and institutional theory. JEL Classification: M10

Australian Journal of Management
University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Institutional and organisational myths: A process model of myth lifecycle — Jaco Lok, Max Ganzin, et al. · Australian Journal of Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS