Belgium’s SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing effectively curbed transmission, yet challenges persist in terms of delays, scalability and population adherence
Through contact tracing, researchers could reconstruct chains of linked cases by linking High-Risk Exposure Contacts (HREC) testing positive to their index case. We present chain-level descriptives, delays and an individual-level analysis of the events that determine chain progression. We used data from contact tracing outside of collectivities between September 2020 and March 2022 in Belgium. We present chain-level generation counts and structure. The individual-level analysis focusses on the events necessary to establish transmission chains from index cases: inclusion, successful contact with the call center, reporting HREC, identifying HREC and testing of HREC. We adjusted for age, sex, household, calendar time, region, vaccination, laboratory-confirmed prior infection, viral load, symptoms and the place in the transmission chain: we differentiated Cases Identified As HREC (CIAH, index cases that had been identified as HREC of another index case) from primary cases. The percentage of CIAH over all cases was 14% and most CIAH (63%) were household-members of the index case. Unsuccessful contact of cases (34% of all index cases) and reporting no HREC (53% of successfully contacted index cases) ended most chains. Among identified HREC, 75% had at least one test result. Persons age 65 and over were less likely successfully contacted (OR 0.59 (95%CI 0.58–0.59)), reporting HREC (OR 0.55 (95%CI 0.54–0.56)) or tested as HREC (OR 0.87 (95%CI 0.85–0.89), reference 25–44 year old). Compared to primary cases, CIAH were associated with less HREC and lower HREC test positivity. Delays however were comparable. The delay from symptom-onset to test result exceeded 4 days for 29% of CIAH. While contact tracing effectively reduced transmission within identified chains, over 80% of cases remained unlinked due to, amongst others, contact failures and non-reporting of HREC. Future efforts would benefit from operational improvements and enhanced population participation.
Authors
- Toon Braeye (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5637-4613)
- Naïma Hammami (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2572-6540)
- Koen Blot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0847-0133)
- Cécile Kremer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2081-7662)
- Niel Hens (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-0637)
- Ángel Rosas-Aguirre (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3271-7028)
- Dieter Van Cauteren (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-4834)
- Joris Adriaan Frank van Loenhout (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7810-7738)
- Laura Cornelissen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4550-9439)
- Adrae Taame
Institutions
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Flemish Community (BE)
- Médecins du Monde (BE)
- Sciensano (Belgium) (BE)
- Grand Charleroi Hospital (BE)
- Hasselt University (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Public Health
- Published
- 2025-10-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24572-5
- Primary Topic
- COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00