Belgium’s SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing effectively curbed transmission, yet challenges persist in terms of delays, scalability and population adherence

Through contact tracing, researchers could reconstruct chains of linked cases by linking High-Risk Exposure Contacts (HREC) testing positive to their index case. We present chain-level descriptives, delays and an individual-level analysis of the events that determine chain progression. We used data from contact tracing outside of collectivities between September 2020 and March 2022 in Belgium. We present chain-level generation counts and structure. The individual-level analysis focusses on the events necessary to establish transmission chains from index cases: inclusion, successful contact with the call center, reporting HREC, identifying HREC and testing of HREC. We adjusted for age, sex, household, calendar time, region, vaccination, laboratory-confirmed prior infection, viral load, symptoms and the place in the transmission chain: we differentiated Cases Identified As HREC (CIAH, index cases that had been identified as HREC of another index case) from primary cases. The percentage of CIAH over all cases was 14% and most CIAH (63%) were household-members of the index case. Unsuccessful contact of cases (34% of all index cases) and reporting no HREC (53% of successfully contacted index cases) ended most chains. Among identified HREC, 75% had at least one test result. Persons age 65 and over were less likely successfully contacted (OR 0.59 (95%CI 0.58–0.59)), reporting HREC (OR 0.55 (95%CI 0.54–0.56)) or tested as HREC (OR 0.87 (95%CI 0.85–0.89), reference 25–44 year old). Compared to primary cases, CIAH were associated with less HREC and lower HREC test positivity. Delays however were comparable. The delay from symptom-onset to test result exceeded 4 days for 29% of CIAH. While contact tracing effectively reduced transmission within identified chains, over 80% of cases remained unlinked due to, amongst others, contact failures and non-reporting of HREC. Future efforts would benefit from operational improvements and enhanced population participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-24572-5
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Belgium’s SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing effectively curbed transmission, yet challenges persist in terms of delays, scalability and population adherence

Toon Braeye, Naïma Hammami, Koen Blot, Cécile Kremer et al.
BMC Public Health
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
article

Belgium’s SARS-CoV-2 contact tracing effectively curbed transmission, yet challenges persist in terms of delays, scalability and population adherence

Toon Braeye, Naïma Hammami, Koen Blot, Cécile Kremer, Niel Hens, Ángel Rosas-Aguirre, Dieter Van Cauteren, Joris Adriaan Frank van Loenhout, Laura Cornelissen, Adrae Taame
article en

Abstract

Through contact tracing, researchers could reconstruct chains of linked cases by linking High-Risk Exposure Contacts (HREC) testing positive to their index case. We present chain-level descriptives, delays and an individual-level analysis of the events that determine chain progression. We used data from contact tracing outside of collectivities between September 2020 and March 2022 in Belgium. We present chain-level generation counts and structure. The individual-level analysis focusses on the events necessary to establish transmission chains from index cases: inclusion, successful contact with the call center, reporting HREC, identifying HREC and testing of HREC. We adjusted for age, sex, household, calendar time, region, vaccination, laboratory-confirmed prior infection, viral load, symptoms and the place in the transmission chain: we differentiated Cases Identified As HREC (CIAH, index cases that had been identified as HREC of another index case) from primary cases. The percentage of CIAH over all cases was 14% and most CIAH (63%) were household-members of the index case. Unsuccessful contact of cases (34% of all index cases) and reporting no HREC (53% of successfully contacted index cases) ended most chains. Among identified HREC, 75% had at least one test result. Persons age 65 and over were less likely successfully contacted (OR 0.59 (95%CI 0.58–0.59)), reporting HREC (OR 0.55 (95%CI 0.54–0.56)) or tested as HREC (OR 0.87 (95%CI 0.85–0.89), reference 25–44 year old). Compared to primary cases, CIAH were associated with less HREC and lower HREC test positivity. Delays however were comparable. The delay from symptom-onset to test result exceeded 4 days for 29% of CIAH. While contact tracing effectively reduced transmission within identified chains, over 80% of cases remained unlinked due to, amongst others, contact failures and non-reporting of HREC. Future efforts would benefit from operational improvements and enhanced population participation.

BMC Public HealthVol. 25(1)
University of Antwerp (BE), Flemish Community (BE), Médecins du Monde (BE), Sciensano (Belgium) (BE), Grand Charleroi Hospital (BE), Hasselt University (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.