Non-consensual collection and analysis of DNA: a contemporary legal lacuna

This article seeks to demonstrate the need for further developmentof Australian law applicable to non-consensual collection and ana-lysis of DNA. There is presently no recognition of proprietary rightsor legal interests in DNA, anyone may take possession of an aban-doned personal item and analyse DNA found on it. Once DNAbecomes dissociated from a person’s body, there are no legalmechanisms which prevent it from being collected and submittedfor genetic analysis such as the ancestry tests offered by Direct toConsumer (DTC) genetic testing services. This analysis can revealsensitive information about a person, such as paternity or diseasecarrier status, and existing privacy law offers little protection.Further, non-forensic DNA samples such as medical samples thatmay be collected in a hospital setting can be repurposed by lawenforcement for investigations. While there are legitimate reasonswhy law enforcement may utilize non-forensic DNA samples, thispractice falls outside the scope of existing forensic procedureslegislation. This article provides a detailed examination of thislegal gap and its contemporary significance, providinga foundation for further law reform.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2025.2574624
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-consensual collection and analysis of DNA: a contemporary legal lacuna

Marcus Smith, Nathan Scudder, Dennis McNevin, Laura Shackel
Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Non-consensual collection and analysis of DNA: a contemporary legal lacuna

Marcus Smith, Nathan Scudder, Dennis McNevin, Laura Shackel
article en

Abstract

This article seeks to demonstrate the need for further developmentof Australian law applicable to non-consensual collection and ana-lysis of DNA. There is presently no recognition of proprietary rightsor legal interests in DNA, anyone may take possession of an aban-doned personal item and analyse DNA found on it. Once DNAbecomes dissociated from a person’s body, there are no legalmechanisms which prevent it from being collected and submittedfor genetic analysis such as the ancestry tests offered by Direct toConsumer (DTC) genetic testing services. This analysis can revealsensitive information about a person, such as paternity or diseasecarrier status, and existing privacy law offers little protection.Further, non-forensic DNA samples such as medical samples thatmay be collected in a hospital setting can be repurposed by lawenforcement for investigations. While there are legitimate reasonswhy law enforcement may utilize non-forensic DNA samples, thispractice falls outside the scope of existing forensic procedureslegislation. This article provides a detailed examination of thislegal gap and its contemporary significance, providinga foundation for further law reform.

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU)
University of Technology Sydney
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-consensual collection and analysis of DNA: a contemporary legal lacuna — Marcus Smith, Nathan Scudder, et al. · Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS