Time shift between precipitation and evaporation has more impact on annual streamflow variability than the elasticity of potential evaporation

Abstract. One of the most basic questions asked of hydrologists is the quantification of catchment response to climatic variations, i.e., the variations around the average annual flow given the climatic anomaly of a particular year. This paper presents an analysis based on 4122 catchments from four continents, where we investigate how annual streamflow variability depends on climate variables – rainfall and potential evaporation – and on the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation. We use catchment data to verify the existence of this link and show that, in all countries and under the main climates represented, anomalies in this synchronicity are the second most important factor to explain annual streamflow anomalies, after precipitation, but before potential evaporation. Introducing the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation as an independent variable improves the prediction of annual streamflow variability with an average additional explained variance of 6 % globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-5477-2025
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time shift between precipitation and evaporation has more impact on annual streamflow variability than the elasticity of potential evaporation

Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Alban de Lavenne, Vazken Andréassian, Julien Lerat
2 citations
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
article

Time shift between precipitation and evaporation has more impact on annual streamflow variability than the elasticity of potential evaporation

Guilherme Mendoza Guimarães, Alban de Lavenne, Vazken Andréassian, Julien Lerat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract. One of the most basic questions asked of hydrologists is the quantification of catchment response to climatic variations, i.e., the variations around the average annual flow given the climatic anomaly of a particular year. This paper presents an analysis based on 4122 catchments from four continents, where we investigate how annual streamflow variability depends on climate variables – rainfall and potential evaporation – and on the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation. We use catchment data to verify the existence of this link and show that, in all countries and under the main climates represented, anomalies in this synchronicity are the second most important factor to explain annual streamflow anomalies, after precipitation, but before potential evaporation. Introducing the synchronicity between precipitation and potential evaporation as an independent variable improves the prediction of annual streamflow variability with an average additional explained variance of 6 % globally.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 29(20)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.