Considering late effects costs in radiotherapy funding

Radiotherapy treatment can have transformative effects on a patient's overall health and wellbeing, yet current funding models are constrained to curative and palliative aspects of treatment delivery. This therapeutic focus, obscures wider costs associated with radiotherapy, both at a service level and for individual patients and their families. It is essential that policy and services consider quality of life after treatment, including identification and management of long-term side effects. Currently, a lack of service provision means that many patients have no access to services equipped to manage late toxicity or are utilising inappropriate services for their needs which could also be more costly for commissioners. As Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) take greater responsibility for the whole cancer pathway there are potential patient and cost benefits of rolling out more supportive oncology and late effects services. This should be supported with better data, including Patient Reported Data (PRD) and research on the level of need for broader aspects of radiotherapy and post treatment aspects of patient experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Radiology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf254
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Considering late effects costs in radiotherapy funding

Nicky Thorp, Joy Archer, Iain Brown, Lina Hacker et al.
1 citations
British Journal of Radiology
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
1.36
article

Considering late effects costs in radiotherapy funding

Nicky Thorp, Joy Archer, Iain Brown, Lina Hacker, C. Rowbottom, Joseph Hayes, L Ashmore, John A. Thomson, D. Hutton, R. Stuart Mackay
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Radiotherapy treatment can have transformative effects on a patient's overall health and wellbeing, yet current funding models are constrained to curative and palliative aspects of treatment delivery. This therapeutic focus, obscures wider costs associated with radiotherapy, both at a service level and for individual patients and their families. It is essential that policy and services consider quality of life after treatment, including identification and management of long-term side effects. Currently, a lack of service provision means that many patients have no access to services equipped to manage late toxicity or are utilising inappropriate services for their needs which could also be more costly for commissioners. As Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) take greater responsibility for the whole cancer pathway there are potential patient and cost benefits of rolling out more supportive oncology and late effects services. This should be supported with better data, including Patient Reported Data (PRD) and research on the level of need for broader aspects of radiotherapy and post treatment aspects of patient experience.

British Journal of RadiologyVol. 98(1176)
Christie's (GB), Croatian Academic and Research Network (HR), Education and Research Network (IN), Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust (GB), The Christie Hospital (GB), NIHR Research Delivery Network (GB), Digital Research Alliance of Canada, Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
1.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.