Connecting Beliefs and Practice: Graduate Students’ Approaches to Theoretical Integration and Equitable Literacy Teaching

This qualitative study explores how graduate students in literacy education connect theoretical frameworks to classroom practices. Grounded in Deweyan pragmatist philosophy and Kucer’s multidimensional literacy theory, researchers analyzed course assignments from online graduate students using document review and content analysis. The methodology employed a collaborative codebook and Dedoose software (version 10.0.25), utilizing descriptive coding to identify literacy practices and deductive coding to examine theoretical alignments. The results show patterns in how graduate students link theory and practice, with varying frequencies of references to different frameworks. Three main themes emerged: students’ integration of multiple theoretical frameworks, their focus on tailoring instruction to students’ developmental needs, and their emphasis on relating literacy instruction to students’ cultural backgrounds and personal experiences. The findings highlight participants’ preference for theoretical diversity, indicating a nuanced understanding of how multiple perspectives can inform teaching practices. This integration reflects educators’ recognition that complex classroom environments require diverse theoretical foundations, emphasizing the value of developing a new survey tool that captures this complexity. These results contribute to our understanding of how literacy educators integrate theoretical knowledge with practical classroom applications in contemporary educational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15101411
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting Beliefs and Practice: Graduate Students’ Approaches to Theoretical Integration and Equitable Literacy Teaching

Tina Chaseley, Qian Chen
Education Sciences
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Connecting Beliefs and Practice: Graduate Students’ Approaches to Theoretical Integration and Equitable Literacy Teaching

Tina Chaseley, Qian Chen
article en

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how graduate students in literacy education connect theoretical frameworks to classroom practices. Grounded in Deweyan pragmatist philosophy and Kucer’s multidimensional literacy theory, researchers analyzed course assignments from online graduate students using document review and content analysis. The methodology employed a collaborative codebook and Dedoose software (version 10.0.25), utilizing descriptive coding to identify literacy practices and deductive coding to examine theoretical alignments. The results show patterns in how graduate students link theory and practice, with varying frequencies of references to different frameworks. Three main themes emerged: students’ integration of multiple theoretical frameworks, their focus on tailoring instruction to students’ developmental needs, and their emphasis on relating literacy instruction to students’ cultural backgrounds and personal experiences. The findings highlight participants’ preference for theoretical diversity, indicating a nuanced understanding of how multiple perspectives can inform teaching practices. This integration reflects educators’ recognition that complex classroom environments require diverse theoretical foundations, emphasizing the value of developing a new survey tool that captures this complexity. These results contribute to our understanding of how literacy educators integrate theoretical knowledge with practical classroom applications in contemporary educational settings.

Education SciencesVol. 15(10)
Northern Arizona University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.