The Effectiveness of ¡Salud!, por la Vida, an Educational Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Puerto Rico

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cancer-related death in Puerto Rico (PR). Yet CRC screening (CRCS) rates remain low. We developed <i>&iexcl;Salud!, por la Vida</i>, an educational intervention aiming to increase CRCS among age-eligible adults living in PR. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial among adults 50-75 years old at Federally Qualified Health Clinics in PR. Participants could not have a history of CRC nor be currently adherent to CRCS guidelines for a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (within last year) or colonoscopy (within last 5-10 years). Out of 445 randomized participants, 355 completed the study procedures (Control: 277; Intervention: 78) and were included in the main analysis. Participants in the intervention arm completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires alongside the educational intervention (at baseline) and two reminder calls (before follow-up) within a four-month period. Control arm participants only completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires within the same period. All participants were followed up to assess CRCS completion. <b>Results</b>: Post-trial screening rates were significantly higher in the intervention group: FOBT/FIT (55% vs. 39%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), colonoscopy (10% vs. 3%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and any CRCS (60% vs. 41%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared to controls, those in the intervention group showed a 48% higher probability of undergoing any CRCS (RR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.17, 1.86), were 1.4 times more likely to complete a FOBT/FIT (RR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.80), and were over 3 times more likely to undergo a colonoscopy (RR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.26, 7.91). <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings underscore the efficacy of the intervention in increasing CRCS uptake, potentially preventing late-stage detection and reducing CRC mortality in PR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17203391
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effectiveness of ¡Salud!, por la Vida, an Educational Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Puerto Rico

Yara Sánchez-Cabrera, Vivian Colón‐López, Francisco J. Muñoz‐Torres, Josheili Y. Llavona-Ortiz et al.
Cancers
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

The Effectiveness of ¡Salud!, por la Vida, an Educational Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Puerto Rico

Yara Sánchez-Cabrera, Vivian Colón‐López, Francisco J. Muñoz‐Torres, Josheili Y. Llavona-Ortiz, Ileska M. Valencia-Torres, María E. Fernández, Marievelisse Soto‐Salgado
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cancer-related death in Puerto Rico (PR). Yet CRC screening (CRCS) rates remain low. We developed <i>&iexcl;Salud!, por la Vida</i>, an educational intervention aiming to increase CRCS among age-eligible adults living in PR. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial among adults 50-75 years old at Federally Qualified Health Clinics in PR. Participants could not have a history of CRC nor be currently adherent to CRCS guidelines for a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (within last year) or colonoscopy (within last 5-10 years). Out of 445 randomized participants, 355 completed the study procedures (Control: 277; Intervention: 78) and were included in the main analysis. Participants in the intervention arm completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires alongside the educational intervention (at baseline) and two reminder calls (before follow-up) within a four-month period. Control arm participants only completed baseline and follow-up questionnaires within the same period. All participants were followed up to assess CRCS completion. <b>Results</b>: Post-trial screening rates were significantly higher in the intervention group: FOBT/FIT (55% vs. 39%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), colonoscopy (10% vs. 3%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and any CRCS (60% vs. 41%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Compared to controls, those in the intervention group showed a 48% higher probability of undergoing any CRCS (RR = 1.48, 95%CI: 1.17, 1.86), were 1.4 times more likely to complete a FOBT/FIT (RR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.09, 1.80), and were over 3 times more likely to undergo a colonoscopy (RR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.26, 7.91). <b>Conclusions</b>: The findings underscore the efficacy of the intervention in increasing CRCS uptake, potentially preventing late-stage detection and reducing CRC mortality in PR.

CancersVol. 17(20)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Puerto Rico System (PR), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), University of Arizona Cancer Center, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.