A Revised Concept for Ocular Surface Imprinting: Easy-to-Use Device for Morphological and Biomolecular-Based Differential Diagnosis

<b>Background/objectives:</b> The continuous necessity to support biostrumental data with biolomecular data collected using non-invasive tools is influencing the world of ocular surface devices. The ocular imprint still represents a non-invasive and safety technique for collecting corneal and conjunctival epithelia in an easy way, as performed in human and veterinary clinics. Although used in clinical practice since 1977, operators might benefit from improvements in these techniques, especially in terms of handling and management. <b>Methods:</b> Herein, by reporting the design and characteristics of a patent of ocular surface sampling (the SurfAL pen and periocular-assisted SurfAL pen; PCT WO2016IB51474 20160316), we performed a validation and analysis of its value compared to gold standards. The level-headedness and advantages of this device were verified in 15 sclerocorneal specimens (sampling advantages) and tested in 25 volunteers (handling and operator efficiency, as well as frequency of discomfort in volunteers). Morphological as well as biomolecular analyses were used to compare SurfAL devices with conventional ones. <b>Results:</b> The easy management of SurfAL pens and the good detection of epithelial/goblet cells were confirmed. The SurfAL pen was found to be smart and suitable for routine analysis, as confirmed by quick and reproducible onsite sampling. Periocular-assisted SurfAL pen was comparable in terms of sampling quality but less comparable in terms of subject confidence due to its geometry. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that the SurfAL pen and periocular-assisted SurfAL pen might represent an additional and hands-on way of sampling ocular surface cells and improve the diagnostic route in ophthalmology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15202660
Primary Topic
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Revised Concept for Ocular Surface Imprinting: Easy-to-Use Device for Morphological and Biomolecular-Based Differential Diagnosis

Rossella Anna Maria Colabelli Gisoldi, Loredana Zollo, Alessandra Micera, Bijorn Omar Balzamino et al.
Diagnostics
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
article

A Revised Concept for Ocular Surface Imprinting: Easy-to-Use Device for Morphological and Biomolecular-Based Differential Diagnosis

Rossella Anna Maria Colabelli Gisoldi, Loredana Zollo, Alessandra Micera, Bijorn Omar Balzamino, Antonio Di Zazzo, Augusto Pocobelli, Roberto Sgrulletta, Ilaria Ghezzi
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/objectives:</b> The continuous necessity to support biostrumental data with biolomecular data collected using non-invasive tools is influencing the world of ocular surface devices. The ocular imprint still represents a non-invasive and safety technique for collecting corneal and conjunctival epithelia in an easy way, as performed in human and veterinary clinics. Although used in clinical practice since 1977, operators might benefit from improvements in these techniques, especially in terms of handling and management. <b>Methods:</b> Herein, by reporting the design and characteristics of a patent of ocular surface sampling (the SurfAL pen and periocular-assisted SurfAL pen; PCT WO2016IB51474 20160316), we performed a validation and analysis of its value compared to gold standards. The level-headedness and advantages of this device were verified in 15 sclerocorneal specimens (sampling advantages) and tested in 25 volunteers (handling and operator efficiency, as well as frequency of discomfort in volunteers). Morphological as well as biomolecular analyses were used to compare SurfAL devices with conventional ones. <b>Results:</b> The easy management of SurfAL pens and the good detection of epithelial/goblet cells were confirmed. The SurfAL pen was found to be smart and suitable for routine analysis, as confirmed by quick and reproducible onsite sampling. Periocular-assisted SurfAL pen was comparable in terms of sampling quality but less comparable in terms of subject confidence due to its geometry. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that the SurfAL pen and periocular-assisted SurfAL pen might represent an additional and hands-on way of sampling ocular surface cells and improve the diagnostic route in ophthalmology.

DiagnosticsVol. 15(20)
Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT), Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata (IT), Fondazione G.B. Bietti (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.