Locking Plate with Cerclage Wiring Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: Is There Still a Role for Hook Plates?

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Hook plate fixation has been widely used for unstable distal clavicle fractures, but concerns remain regarding implant-related complications and the need for secondary removal. Locking plate fixation with supplementary cerclage wiring has been proposed as an alternative that may provide stability while reducing complications. This study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of locking plate fixation with cerclage wiring versus hook plate fixation. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for unstable distal clavicle fractures (Cho's classification type II) between 2015 and 2024. Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Two techniques were evaluated: locking plate with cerclage wiring (Group 1) and hook plate fixation (Group 2). Clinical outcomes, including complications, range of motion, and patient satisfaction, were compared at the final follow-up. <i>Results</i>: A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria: 27 in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. The overall mean follow-up period was 13.17 ± 8.46 months. The distribution of fracture types was not significantly different between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.287). Complications were more frequent in Group 2 (40%), including postoperative stiffness requiring capsular release (70%), nonunion requiring revision (20%), and peri-implant fracture (10%). The overall union rate was 100% in Group 1 and 80% in Group 2. In contrast, Group 1 had only one complication (3.7%), a peri-implant fracture (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Shoulder range of motion at the final follow-up showed no significant difference between groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: Hook plate fixation was associated with a significantly higher complication rate compared with locking plate fixation with cerclage wiring. Locking plate fixation with supplementary cerclage wiring appears to be a better surgical option for unstable distal clavicle fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61101882
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locking Plate with Cerclage Wiring Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: Is There Still a Role for Hook Plates?

Hyun Seok Song, Hyungsuk Kim
1 citations
Medicina
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
1.35
article

Locking Plate with Cerclage Wiring Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: Is There Still a Role for Hook Plates?

Hyun Seok Song, Hyungsuk Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: Hook plate fixation has been widely used for unstable distal clavicle fractures, but concerns remain regarding implant-related complications and the need for secondary removal. Locking plate fixation with supplementary cerclage wiring has been proposed as an alternative that may provide stability while reducing complications. This study compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of locking plate fixation with cerclage wiring versus hook plate fixation. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for unstable distal clavicle fractures (Cho's classification type II) between 2015 and 2024. Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. Two techniques were evaluated: locking plate with cerclage wiring (Group 1) and hook plate fixation (Group 2). Clinical outcomes, including complications, range of motion, and patient satisfaction, were compared at the final follow-up. <i>Results</i>: A total of 52 patients met the inclusion criteria: 27 in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. The overall mean follow-up period was 13.17 ± 8.46 months. The distribution of fracture types was not significantly different between groups (<i>p</i> = 0.287). Complications were more frequent in Group 2 (40%), including postoperative stiffness requiring capsular release (70%), nonunion requiring revision (20%), and peri-implant fracture (10%). The overall union rate was 100% in Group 1 and 80% in Group 2. In contrast, Group 1 had only one complication (3.7%), a peri-implant fracture (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Shoulder range of motion at the final follow-up showed no significant difference between groups. <i>Conclusions</i>: Hook plate fixation was associated with a significantly higher complication rate compared with locking plate fixation with cerclage wiring. Locking plate fixation with supplementary cerclage wiring appears to be a better surgical option for unstable distal clavicle fractures.

MedicinaVol. 61(10)
Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Locking Plate with Cerclage Wiring Versus Hook Plate Fixation for Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures: Is There Still a Role for Hook Plates? — Hyun Seok Song, Hyungsuk Kim · Medicina (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS