A Retrospective Study Regarding the Implementation of Laparoscopy in Colon Cancer Through the Evaluation of Lymph Node Yield and Oncological Safety Margins in a Medium-Volume Center in Eastern Europe

<b>Background:</b> Laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly adopted for colorectal cancer because of their advantages in perioperative outcomes. However, their implementation in medium-volume centers (<50 laparoscopic resections per year) remains limited. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on 274 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Of these, 71 (25.91%) underwent laparoscopic surgical procedures (LS) and 203 (74.09%) open surgical procedures (OS). Primary and secondary endpoints included lymph node yield, resection margin distance, tumor stage, and hospital stay. <b>Results:</b> The mean lymph node yield was significantly higher in the open surgical procedure group (19.74 ± 10.63) compared to the laparoscopic group (16.09 ± 5.71, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients with significant cardiopulmonary disease or prior abdominal surgery were more often directed to open surgery, introducing selection bias that may explain differences in lymph node yield and hospital stay independent of surgical technique. The resection margin distance was significantly greater in laparoscopic cases (5.68 ± 3.12 mm) than in open procedures (4.76 ± 4.47 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (7.14 ± 2.32 days) compared to the open group (13.17 ± 6.76 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in tumor staging was also observed between surgical approaches (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with earlier-stage tumors more likely treated laparoscopically. <b>Conclusions:</b> In a medium-volume center, laparoscopic surgical procedures provided comparable oncologic outcomes and superior perioperative benefits relative to open surgery, despite being more frequently performed for early-stage tumors. These findings support the safe adoption of laparoscopic colectomy outside high-volume academic settings, provided appropriate case selection and technical standards are maintained.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13102570
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Retrospective Study Regarding the Implementation of Laparoscopy in Colon Cancer Through the Evaluation of Lymph Node Yield and Oncological Safety Margins in a Medium-Volume Center in Eastern Europe

Cristina Orlov Slavu, Iulian Slavu, Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu, Ileana Dima et al.
Biomedicines
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

A Retrospective Study Regarding the Implementation of Laparoscopy in Colon Cancer Through the Evaluation of Lymph Node Yield and Oncological Safety Margins in a Medium-Volume Center in Eastern Europe

Cristina Orlov Slavu, Iulian Slavu, Daniela-Elena Gheoca Mutu, Ileana Dima, Marius Nicolae Popescu, Alexandru Dogaru, Bogdan Nițescu, Raluca Tulin, Adrian Tulin
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Laparoscopic surgical procedures are increasingly adopted for colorectal cancer because of their advantages in perioperative outcomes. However, their implementation in medium-volume centers (<50 laparoscopic resections per year) remains limited. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on 274 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery between January 2021 and June 2025. Of these, 71 (25.91%) underwent laparoscopic surgical procedures (LS) and 203 (74.09%) open surgical procedures (OS). Primary and secondary endpoints included lymph node yield, resection margin distance, tumor stage, and hospital stay. <b>Results:</b> The mean lymph node yield was significantly higher in the open surgical procedure group (19.74 ± 10.63) compared to the laparoscopic group (16.09 ± 5.71, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Patients with significant cardiopulmonary disease or prior abdominal surgery were more often directed to open surgery, introducing selection bias that may explain differences in lymph node yield and hospital stay independent of surgical technique. The resection margin distance was significantly greater in laparoscopic cases (5.68 ± 3.12 mm) than in open procedures (4.76 ± 4.47 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (7.14 ± 2.32 days) compared to the open group (13.17 ± 6.76 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in tumor staging was also observed between surgical approaches (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with earlier-stage tumors more likely treated laparoscopically. <b>Conclusions:</b> In a medium-volume center, laparoscopic surgical procedures provided comparable oncologic outcomes and superior perioperative benefits relative to open surgery, despite being more frequently performed for early-stage tumors. These findings support the safe adoption of laparoscopic colectomy outside high-volume academic settings, provided appropriate case selection and technical standards are maintained.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(10)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.