Study on the Dynamic Responses of a Concrete-Block-Panel-Wrapped Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall: A Model Test

Reinforced soil retaining walls (RSWs) for railways are key subgrade structures that bear cyclic loads from trains, and their long-term durability directly affects railway operation safety. The mechanical behavior of RSWs under cyclic loading has been extensively investigated in previous studies, primarily focusing on seismic conditions or conventional structural configurations. While these works have established fundamental understanding of load transfer mechanisms and deformation patterns, research on their responses to long-term train-induced vibrations, particularly for concrete-block-panel-wrapped RSWs, an improved structure based on traditional concrete-block-panel RSWs, remains limited. To investigate the dynamic responses of the concrete-block-panel-wrapped RSW, a model test was conducted under cyclic loading conditions where the amplitude was 30 kPa and the frequency was 10 Hz. The model size was 3.0 m in length, 1.0 m in width, and 1.8 m in height, incorporating six layers of geogrid. Each layer of geogrid was 2.0 m in length with a vertical spacing of 0.3 m or 0.15 m. The results indicate that as the number of load cycles increases, deformation, acceleration, static and dynamic stresses, and geogrid strain also increase and gradually stabilize, exhibiting only marginal increments thereafter. The maximum horizontal displacement reaches 0.08% of the wall height (H), with horizontal displacement increasing uniformly along the height of the wall. The vertical acceleration in the non-reinforced soil zone is lower than that in the reinforced soil zone. The horizontal dynamic stress acting on the back of the panel remains minimal and is uniformly distributed along the height of the wall. The maximum geogrid strain was found to be 0.88%, corresponding to a tensile stress amounting to 20.33% of its ultimate tensile strength. The predicted failure surface approximates a bilinear configuration, consisting of one line parallel to the wall face at a distance of 0.3H from the back of the soil bags and another line inclined at an angle equal to the soil’s internal friction angle (φ) relative to the horizontal plane. This study has important reference significance for the application of concrete-block-panel-wrapped RSWs in railways.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203797
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Dynamic Responses of a Concrete-Block-Panel-Wrapped Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall: A Model Test

Jiannan Xu, Zhiwen Song, Xiao Ping Zhou, He Wang
Buildings
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Study on the Dynamic Responses of a Concrete-Block-Panel-Wrapped Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall: A Model Test

Jiannan Xu, Zhiwen Song, Xiao Ping Zhou, He Wang
article en

Abstract

Reinforced soil retaining walls (RSWs) for railways are key subgrade structures that bear cyclic loads from trains, and their long-term durability directly affects railway operation safety. The mechanical behavior of RSWs under cyclic loading has been extensively investigated in previous studies, primarily focusing on seismic conditions or conventional structural configurations. While these works have established fundamental understanding of load transfer mechanisms and deformation patterns, research on their responses to long-term train-induced vibrations, particularly for concrete-block-panel-wrapped RSWs, an improved structure based on traditional concrete-block-panel RSWs, remains limited. To investigate the dynamic responses of the concrete-block-panel-wrapped RSW, a model test was conducted under cyclic loading conditions where the amplitude was 30 kPa and the frequency was 10 Hz. The model size was 3.0 m in length, 1.0 m in width, and 1.8 m in height, incorporating six layers of geogrid. Each layer of geogrid was 2.0 m in length with a vertical spacing of 0.3 m or 0.15 m. The results indicate that as the number of load cycles increases, deformation, acceleration, static and dynamic stresses, and geogrid strain also increase and gradually stabilize, exhibiting only marginal increments thereafter. The maximum horizontal displacement reaches 0.08% of the wall height (H), with horizontal displacement increasing uniformly along the height of the wall. The vertical acceleration in the non-reinforced soil zone is lower than that in the reinforced soil zone. The horizontal dynamic stress acting on the back of the panel remains minimal and is uniformly distributed along the height of the wall. The maximum geogrid strain was found to be 0.88%, corresponding to a tensile stress amounting to 20.33% of its ultimate tensile strength. The predicted failure surface approximates a bilinear configuration, consisting of one line parallel to the wall face at a distance of 0.3H from the back of the soil bags and another line inclined at an angle equal to the soil’s internal friction angle (φ) relative to the horizontal plane. This study has important reference significance for the application of concrete-block-panel-wrapped RSWs in railways.

BuildingsVol. 15(20)
China Railway Design Corporation (China) (CN), Shijiazhuang Tiedao University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.