What Is Environmental Biotechnology? Although Widely Applied, a Clear Definition of the Term Is Still Needed

The term Environmental Biotechnology is widely used, but lacks a universally accepted definition, with varying interpretations across disciplines and sectors leading to challenges in funding, policy formulation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Through a literature review and engagement activities, this study examines existing definitions, identifies key areas of divergence, and explores pathways toward a more cohesive understanding. Findings reveal a spectrum of valid interpretations, often shaped by specific contexts, with researchers generally recognising a shared conceptual framework within their own subfields but encountering ambiguities across subject boundaries. Common points of difference include whether Environmental Biotechnology is restricted to microorganisms or encompasses other biological systems. Some understandings reflect sector-specific needs, contributing to fragmentation, though a broader approach could strengthen the field’s identity by providing a unifying framework, mapping overlaps with related fields such as Industrial Biotechnology. A working definition is proposed for Environmental Biotechnology as the use of biologically mediated systems for environmental protection and bioremediation, incorporating resource recovery and bioenergy production where these enhance system sustainability. Importantly, it was recognised that any definition must remain adaptable, reflecting the evolving nature of both the science and its applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environments
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/environments12100393
Primary Topic
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is Environmental Biotechnology? Although Widely Applied, a Clear Definition of the Term Is Still Needed

Angela Bywater, Thomas P. Curtis, Jhuma Sadhukhan, Tony Gutiérrez et al.
Environments
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
article

What Is Environmental Biotechnology? Although Widely Applied, a Clear Definition of the Term Is Still Needed

Angela Bywater, Thomas P. Curtis, Jhuma Sadhukhan, Tony Gutiérrez, Sigrid Kusch-Brandt, Adrian P. Higson, Frédéric Coulon, S. Heaven, Louise Byfield
article en

Abstract

The term Environmental Biotechnology is widely used, but lacks a universally accepted definition, with varying interpretations across disciplines and sectors leading to challenges in funding, policy formulation, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Through a literature review and engagement activities, this study examines existing definitions, identifies key areas of divergence, and explores pathways toward a more cohesive understanding. Findings reveal a spectrum of valid interpretations, often shaped by specific contexts, with researchers generally recognising a shared conceptual framework within their own subfields but encountering ambiguities across subject boundaries. Common points of difference include whether Environmental Biotechnology is restricted to microorganisms or encompasses other biological systems. Some understandings reflect sector-specific needs, contributing to fragmentation, though a broader approach could strengthen the field’s identity by providing a unifying framework, mapping overlaps with related fields such as Industrial Biotechnology. A working definition is proposed for Environmental Biotechnology as the use of biologically mediated systems for environmental protection and bioremediation, incorporating resource recovery and bioenergy production where these enhance system sustainability. Importantly, it was recognised that any definition must remain adaptable, reflecting the evolving nature of both the science and its applications.

EnvironmentsVol. 12(10)
University of Surrey (GB), Heriot-Watt University (GB), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE), University of Southampton (GB), University of York (GB), Cranfield University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Directorate for Biological Sciences, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.