Early Use of Cryoprecipitate Versus Plasma and Clinical Outcomes in Major Spine Surgery

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Major spine surgery often leads to significant blood loss and coagulopathy, necessitating blood product transfusion. Cryoprecipitate and plasma are two blood products commonly used to manage coagulopathy, but outcomes associated with their use in spine surgery remain unclear. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing major spine surgery from 2015 to 2022 within a single health system. Included patients received at least one unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) followed by either cryoprecipitate or plasma to investigate the treatment of coagulopathy after blood loss. Study endpoints included hospital length of stay (H-LOS), ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), discharge disposition, one-year mortality, and total blood products transfused up to postoperative day (POD) 2. Multivariable linear and logistic regression was used to estimate associations between the use of cryoprecipitate or plasma and outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Of 189 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 120 received cryoprecipitate, and 69 received plasma as the first product after PRBCs. In the univariable analysis, the cryoprecipitate group had lower 1-year mortality (5.0% vs. 14.5%; [95% CI]: 0.31 [0.10, 0.88], <i>p</i> = 0.0031) and a shorter ICU-LOS (46 vs. 74 h; [95% CI]: 0.73 [0.53, 1.00], <i>p</i> = 0.048). However, despite a trend favoring the cryoprecipitate group, there were no differences between the cryoprecipitate and plasma groups in the multivariable model for H-LOS (adjusted geometric mean ratio [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.68, 1.04], <i>p</i> = 0.109), ICU-LOS (adjusted geometric mean ratio [95% CI]: 0.72 [0.50, 1.04], <i>p</i> = 0.078), one-year mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.49 [0.13, 1.88], <i>p</i> = 0.288), or total blood products transfused up to POD2 (adjusted mean difference [95% CI]: -1 unit [-2, 1], <i>p</i> = 0.253). Compared with plasma, patients in the cryoprecipitate group were more likely to be discharged to home independently versus disposition to other facility or needing assistance (adjusted OR 0.41 [95% CI]: 0.16, 0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.049). <b>Conclusions</b>: Use of cryoprecipitate was associated with higher odds of home discharge, while other outcomes were similar between the two groups once adjusting for potential confounders. Further research is needed to better appreciate the clinical impact of the choice of blood products to treat coagulopathy in the setting of bleeding in major spine surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207441
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Use of Cryoprecipitate Versus Plasma and Clinical Outcomes in Major Spine Surgery

Jong ok La, Miriam M. Treggiari, Aparna Depuru, Nicole R. Guinn
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Early Use of Cryoprecipitate Versus Plasma and Clinical Outcomes in Major Spine Surgery

Jong ok La, Miriam M. Treggiari, Aparna Depuru, Nicole R. Guinn
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Major spine surgery often leads to significant blood loss and coagulopathy, necessitating blood product transfusion. Cryoprecipitate and plasma are two blood products commonly used to manage coagulopathy, but outcomes associated with their use in spine surgery remain unclear. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing major spine surgery from 2015 to 2022 within a single health system. Included patients received at least one unit of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) followed by either cryoprecipitate or plasma to investigate the treatment of coagulopathy after blood loss. Study endpoints included hospital length of stay (H-LOS), ICU length of stay (ICU-LOS), discharge disposition, one-year mortality, and total blood products transfused up to postoperative day (POD) 2. Multivariable linear and logistic regression was used to estimate associations between the use of cryoprecipitate or plasma and outcomes. <b>Results</b>: Of 189 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 120 received cryoprecipitate, and 69 received plasma as the first product after PRBCs. In the univariable analysis, the cryoprecipitate group had lower 1-year mortality (5.0% vs. 14.5%; [95% CI]: 0.31 [0.10, 0.88], <i>p</i> = 0.0031) and a shorter ICU-LOS (46 vs. 74 h; [95% CI]: 0.73 [0.53, 1.00], <i>p</i> = 0.048). However, despite a trend favoring the cryoprecipitate group, there were no differences between the cryoprecipitate and plasma groups in the multivariable model for H-LOS (adjusted geometric mean ratio [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.68, 1.04], <i>p</i> = 0.109), ICU-LOS (adjusted geometric mean ratio [95% CI]: 0.72 [0.50, 1.04], <i>p</i> = 0.078), one-year mortality (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.49 [0.13, 1.88], <i>p</i> = 0.288), or total blood products transfused up to POD2 (adjusted mean difference [95% CI]: -1 unit [-2, 1], <i>p</i> = 0.253). Compared with plasma, patients in the cryoprecipitate group were more likely to be discharged to home independently versus disposition to other facility or needing assistance (adjusted OR 0.41 [95% CI]: 0.16, 0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.049). <b>Conclusions</b>: Use of cryoprecipitate was associated with higher odds of home discharge, while other outcomes were similar between the two groups once adjusting for potential confounders. Further research is needed to better appreciate the clinical impact of the choice of blood products to treat coagulopathy in the setting of bleeding in major spine surgery.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(20)
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke University Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.