Corporate (Alleged) Wrongdoings, Settlements, and Restitution: The Story of When Two Wrongs Make One Right

ABSTRACT U.S. securities authorities can cease civil and criminal investigations using settlements as a resolution vehicle instead of bringing firms to trial. This study analyzes reputational and economic penalties in securities value when a settlement negotiation fine is paid as restitution toward specific victims. Using 176 AAER settlement cases between 2007 and 2016, the findings suggest that when restitution is paid to shareholders, it positively impacts securities’ values. In the seven-day window (−3,3), results indicate that the impact of the restitution paid to victims on the stock price offsets up to 80 percent of the loss in share value. In the 17-day window (−8,8), the effect of victims’ restitution offsets valuation losses from the announcement. This effect is absent in the 17-day window (−8,8) when fines are paid to the public interest. The findings suggest compensating victims allows a fuller recovery of reputational and economic losses in securities value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Accounting Research
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/jfar-2022-015
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate (Alleged) Wrongdoings, Settlements, and Restitution: The Story of When Two Wrongs Make One Right

Jesus R. Jimenez-Andrade, Sara Kern
Journal of Forensic Accounting Research
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Corporate (Alleged) Wrongdoings, Settlements, and Restitution: The Story of When Two Wrongs Make One Right

Jesus R. Jimenez-Andrade, Sara Kern
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT U.S. securities authorities can cease civil and criminal investigations using settlements as a resolution vehicle instead of bringing firms to trial. This study analyzes reputational and economic penalties in securities value when a settlement negotiation fine is paid as restitution toward specific victims. Using 176 AAER settlement cases between 2007 and 2016, the findings suggest that when restitution is paid to shareholders, it positively impacts securities’ values. In the seven-day window (−3,3), results indicate that the impact of the restitution paid to victims on the stock price offsets up to 80 percent of the loss in share value. In the 17-day window (−8,8), the effect of victims’ restitution offsets valuation losses from the announcement. This effect is absent in the 17-day window (−8,8) when fines are paid to the public interest. The findings suggest compensating victims allows a fuller recovery of reputational and economic losses in securities value.

Journal of Forensic Accounting ResearchVol. 10(1)
Gonzaga University (US), Texas A&M University – San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.