Assessing recovery and conservation of Australian freshwater fishes with the IUCN Green Status of Species and structured expert elicitation

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Green Status of Species (GSS), introduced in 2021, is a global standard of measurement used to assess the level to which a species has recovered (i.e., is viable and providing its ecological function across its entire range). It is also used to evaluate how a species has responded to past conservation actions and the expected conservation gains and recovery potential it would receive in the short- and long-term future. Preliminary application of the GSS method has relied on expert knowledge from individuals or small groups of specialists. However, more accurate and reliable results are likely to be produced by formally eliciting individual judgments from a diverse range of experts, followed by discussion, reevaluation, and synthesis of these judgments. We developed a method in which 2 structured expert elicitation workshops are used to conduct GSS assessments and applied this method to 8 Australian freshwater fish species from the Murray-Darling Basin. We integrated the investigate, discuss, evaluate, aggregate protocol into the GSS methods; experts assessed the species' IUCN Green Score (percent recovery) in the current state and for 5 other scenarios in the past and future with and without conservation. Four GSS conservation impact metrics were calculated based on the averages of expert judgments. Experts forecasted that impact in the short-term would be minimal (i.e., conservation gain metric = zero or low) for 5 of the 8 species because targeted and maintained conservation actions are often lacking. In contrast, experts indicated long-term recovery potential would be considerably higher if implementation of appropriate recovery activities could be sustained (all 8 species had medium or high recovery potential). We concluded that the GSS is well suited to a modified workshop approach because it aims to reduce biases associated with expert judgments and encourages valuable knowledge sharing among experts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70160
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing recovery and conservation of Australian freshwater fishes with the IUCN Green Status of Species and structured expert elicitation

Iain Ellis, Luciano B. Beheregaray, Matthew McLellan, Chris J. Brauer et al.
Conservation Biology
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
article

Assessing recovery and conservation of Australian freshwater fishes with the IUCN Green Status of Species and structured expert elicitation

Iain Ellis, Luciano B. Beheregaray, Matthew McLellan, Chris J. Brauer, Luke Pearce, Mark Lintermans, Adam Kerezsy, Molly K. Grace, Nick S. Whiterod, David G. Chapple, Zeb Tonkin, Jessica C. Walsh, John D. Koehn, Jarod Lyon, Maiko L. Lutz, Peter J. Unmack, Tarmo A. Raadik
article en

Abstract

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Green Status of Species (GSS), introduced in 2021, is a global standard of measurement used to assess the level to which a species has recovered (i.e., is viable and providing its ecological function across its entire range). It is also used to evaluate how a species has responded to past conservation actions and the expected conservation gains and recovery potential it would receive in the short- and long-term future. Preliminary application of the GSS method has relied on expert knowledge from individuals or small groups of specialists. However, more accurate and reliable results are likely to be produced by formally eliciting individual judgments from a diverse range of experts, followed by discussion, reevaluation, and synthesis of these judgments. We developed a method in which 2 structured expert elicitation workshops are used to conduct GSS assessments and applied this method to 8 Australian freshwater fish species from the Murray-Darling Basin. We integrated the investigate, discuss, evaluate, aggregate protocol into the GSS methods; experts assessed the species' IUCN Green Score (percent recovery) in the current state and for 5 other scenarios in the past and future with and without conservation. Four GSS conservation impact metrics were calculated based on the averages of expert judgments. Experts forecasted that impact in the short-term would be minimal (i.e., conservation gain metric = zero or low) for 5 of the 8 species because targeted and maintained conservation actions are often lacking. In contrast, experts indicated long-term recovery potential would be considerably higher if implementation of appropriate recovery activities could be sustained (all 8 species had medium or high recovery potential). We concluded that the GSS is well suited to a modified workshop approach because it aims to reduce biases associated with expert judgments and encourages valuable knowledge sharing among experts.

Conservation BiologyVol. 39(6)
Bush Heritage Australia (AU), Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Flinders University (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), University of Oxford (GB), Goyder Institute for Water Research (AU), Sydney Fish Market (Australia) (AU), Fishwell Consulting (Australia) (AU), ACT Government (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.