Home‐range spillover in habitats with impassable boundaries: Causes, biases and corrections using autocorrelated kernel density estimation

Abstract An animal's home‐range plays a fundamental role in determining its resource use and overlap with conspecifics, competitors and predators, and is therefore a common focus of movement ecology studies. Autocorrelated kernel density estimation addresses many of the shortcomings of traditional home‐range estimators when animal tracking data are autocorrelated, but other challenges in home‐range estimation remain. One such issue is known as ‘spillover bias’, in which home‐range estimates do not respect impassable movement boundaries (e.g. shorelines and fences), and occurs in all forms of kernel density estimation. While several approaches to addressing spillover bias are used when estimating home ranges, these approaches introduce bias throughout the remaining home‐range area, depending on the amount of spillover removed, or are otherwise inaccessible to most ecologists. Here, we introduce local corrections to home‐range kernels to mitigate spillover bias in (autocorrelated) kernel density estimation in the continuous time movement model (ctmm) package, and demonstrate their performance using simulations with known home‐range extents and distributions, and a real‐world case study. Simulation results showed that local corrections minimized bias in bounded home‐range area estimates, and resulted in more accurate distributions when compared with commonly used post hoc corrections, particularly at small–intermediate sample sizes. Comparison of the impacts of local vs. post hoc corrections to bounded home‐ranges estimated from lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) demonstrated that local corrections constrained the redistribution of probability mass within the remaining home‐range area, resulting in proportionally smaller home‐range areas compared with when post hoc corrections are used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70082
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Home‐range spillover in habitats with impassable boundaries: Causes, biases and corrections using autocorrelated kernel density estimation

Christen H. Fleming, Nigel E. Hussey, Justin M. Calabrese, William F. Fagan et al.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Home‐range spillover in habitats with impassable boundaries: Causes, biases and corrections using autocorrelated kernel density estimation

Christen H. Fleming, Nigel E. Hussey, Justin M. Calabrese, William F. Fagan, Les N. Harris, Brendan K. Malley, Michael Noonan, Jesse M. Alston, Jack Hollins, Jocelyn Moore
article en

Abstract

Abstract An animal's home‐range plays a fundamental role in determining its resource use and overlap with conspecifics, competitors and predators, and is therefore a common focus of movement ecology studies. Autocorrelated kernel density estimation addresses many of the shortcomings of traditional home‐range estimators when animal tracking data are autocorrelated, but other challenges in home‐range estimation remain. One such issue is known as ‘spillover bias’, in which home‐range estimates do not respect impassable movement boundaries (e.g. shorelines and fences), and occurs in all forms of kernel density estimation. While several approaches to addressing spillover bias are used when estimating home ranges, these approaches introduce bias throughout the remaining home‐range area, depending on the amount of spillover removed, or are otherwise inaccessible to most ecologists. Here, we introduce local corrections to home‐range kernels to mitigate spillover bias in (autocorrelated) kernel density estimation in the continuous time movement model (ctmm) package, and demonstrate their performance using simulations with known home‐range extents and distributions, and a real‐world case study. Simulation results showed that local corrections minimized bias in bounded home‐range area estimates, and resulted in more accurate distributions when compared with commonly used post hoc corrections, particularly at small–intermediate sample sizes. Comparison of the impacts of local vs. post hoc corrections to bounded home‐ranges estimated from lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) demonstrated that local corrections constrained the redistribution of probability mass within the remaining home‐range area, resulting in proportionally smaller home‐range areas compared with when post hoc corrections are used.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 16(12)
University of Central Florida (US), Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), University of Arizona (US), University of British Columbia (CA), Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute (US), Center for Northern Studies (CA), National Zoological Park (US), Eugene Research Institute (US), Center for Advanced Systems Understanding (DE), Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec) (CA), Université Laval (CA), University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus (CA), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Windsor (CA), Okanagan University College (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.