Integrating Geopolitics Into the Psychological Study of Intergroup Conflict and Violence: The Role of Collective Narratives

ABSTRACT The concept of narrative can be useful for incorporating a consideration of geopolitical contexts into the psychological study of intergroup conflict and violence. We explore various forms of narratives, including historical narratives, global narratives, narrative templates, clashing narratives, and ideological narratives, and illustrate how accounting for these different forms of narratives in psychological research can enhance its explanatory power by clarifying the interplay between individual and group‐level processes. Paying closer attention to the narratives that shape common sense assumptions calls for increased reflexivity in research questions and awareness of power imbalances structuring geopolitical dynamics. This paper contributes to the emerging field of geopolitical psychology by demonstrating how narratives serve as a critical conceptual tool for understanding intergroup conflict, peace, and reconciliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Issues
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.70040
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Geopolitics Into the Psychological Study of Intergroup Conflict and Violence: The Role of Collective Narratives

Ella Ben Hagai, Rezarta Bilali
Journal of Social Issues
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Integrating Geopolitics Into the Psychological Study of Intergroup Conflict and Violence: The Role of Collective Narratives

Ella Ben Hagai, Rezarta Bilali
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The concept of narrative can be useful for incorporating a consideration of geopolitical contexts into the psychological study of intergroup conflict and violence. We explore various forms of narratives, including historical narratives, global narratives, narrative templates, clashing narratives, and ideological narratives, and illustrate how accounting for these different forms of narratives in psychological research can enhance its explanatory power by clarifying the interplay between individual and group‐level processes. Paying closer attention to the narratives that shape common sense assumptions calls for increased reflexivity in research questions and awareness of power imbalances structuring geopolitical dynamics. This paper contributes to the emerging field of geopolitical psychology by demonstrating how narratives serve as a critical conceptual tool for understanding intergroup conflict, peace, and reconciliation.

Journal of Social IssuesVol. 81(4)
California State University, Fullerton (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.