European Without Euros: How Geopolitical Histories Shape the Symbolic Boundaries of Europe

ABSTRACT This paper examines how geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geocultural dynamics shape the symbolic boundaries of Europe and the psychological and political consequences of those boundaries. We extend traditional models of social identification by arguing that claims to group representativeness ‐ and the recognition of such claims ‐ are deeply informed by geopolitical contexts often neglected in mainstream psychological theory. Drawing on data from three studies conducted in Romania, Serbia, and Türkiye, we explore how perceptions of Europe's boundaries are socially constructed and experienced in non‐Western European contexts. Study 1 investigates how geopolitical positioning informs constructions of a superordinate European identity, revealing a dominant framing of Europe as a “Western” project. Study 2 shows how this framing influences national self‐ and other‐stereotyping, demonstrating an internalization of low status among non‐Western countries in Europe. Study 3 experimentally evidences how positive recognition can create more positive geopolitical attitudes toward various European supranational organizations. Together, these studies show that geopolitical inclusion and exclusion have meaningful psychological effects. We argue for a more explicit integration of geopolitical histories and conditions into psychological research on superordinate identity. In doing so, we contribute to the emerging field of geopolitical psychology and highlight the mutually reinforcing relationship between geopolitical positioning and psychological recognition in defining the boundaries of Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Issues
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.70033
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

European Without Euros: How Geopolitical Histories Shape the Symbolic Boundaries of Europe

Mihaela Boza, Sandra Obradović, Nihan Albayrak‐Aydemir, Reşit Kışlıoğlu et al.
1 citations
Journal of Social Issues
European Union Policy and Governance
8.52
article

European Without Euros: How Geopolitical Histories Shape the Symbolic Boundaries of Europe

Mihaela Boza, Sandra Obradović, Nihan Albayrak‐Aydemir, Reşit Kışlıoğlu, Amena Amer, Murray Kennedy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines how geopolitical, geoeconomic, and geocultural dynamics shape the symbolic boundaries of Europe and the psychological and political consequences of those boundaries. We extend traditional models of social identification by arguing that claims to group representativeness ‐ and the recognition of such claims ‐ are deeply informed by geopolitical contexts often neglected in mainstream psychological theory. Drawing on data from three studies conducted in Romania, Serbia, and Türkiye, we explore how perceptions of Europe's boundaries are socially constructed and experienced in non‐Western European contexts. Study 1 investigates how geopolitical positioning informs constructions of a superordinate European identity, revealing a dominant framing of Europe as a “Western” project. Study 2 shows how this framing influences national self‐ and other‐stereotyping, demonstrating an internalization of low status among non‐Western countries in Europe. Study 3 experimentally evidences how positive recognition can create more positive geopolitical attitudes toward various European supranational organizations. Together, these studies show that geopolitical inclusion and exclusion have meaningful psychological effects. We argue for a more explicit integration of geopolitical histories and conditions into psychological research on superordinate identity. In doing so, we contribute to the emerging field of geopolitical psychology and highlight the mutually reinforcing relationship between geopolitical positioning and psychological recognition in defining the boundaries of Europe.

Journal of Social IssuesVol. 81(4)
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University (RO), Başkent University (TR), Başkent University Hospital (TR), Boğaziçi University (TR), University College London (GB), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
European Association of Social Psychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.