Responding to Information‐Based Regulation: A Behavioral Analysis of the UK's Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme

ABSTRACT Regulators increasingly rely on public information disclosure to influence organizational behaviors. Prior research is mixed on the effects of information‐based instruments in an environment of abundant online information. The study applies a behavioral perspective to examine how regulatory ratings shape the responses of regulated entities by serving as carriers of attention. We present evidence based on a natural experiment arising from regulatory changes in the United Kingdom and a dataset of the food hygiene rating scores of 286,605 food outlets within 2015–2019. The findings demonstrate how responses from food outlets vary based on features like physical versus online‐only disclosure. We discuss how behavioral responses can inform regulators' choice architecture of instrument design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70092
Primary Topic
Food Safety and Hygiene
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responding to Information‐Based Regulation: A Behavioral Analysis of the UK's Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme

Panos Panagiotopoulos, Frances Bowen
Regulation & Governance
Food Safety and Hygiene
article

Responding to Information‐Based Regulation: A Behavioral Analysis of the UK's Food Hygiene Ratings Scheme

Panos Panagiotopoulos, Frances Bowen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Regulators increasingly rely on public information disclosure to influence organizational behaviors. Prior research is mixed on the effects of information‐based instruments in an environment of abundant online information. The study applies a behavioral perspective to examine how regulatory ratings shape the responses of regulated entities by serving as carriers of attention. We present evidence based on a natural experiment arising from regulatory changes in the United Kingdom and a dataset of the food hygiene rating scores of 286,605 food outlets within 2015–2019. The findings demonstrate how responses from food outlets vary based on features like physical versus online‐only disclosure. We discuss how behavioral responses can inform regulators' choice architecture of instrument design.

Regulation & Governance
University of Essex (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), London School of Business and Management (GB)
Government of the United Kingdom
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Food Safety and Hygiene
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.