Artificial intelligence regulation matures: Landscapes of the USA, European Union, and China

Between 2023 and July 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) governance in the USA, European Union, and China shifted from programmatic statements to actionable instruments. The USA moved from Executive Order 14110 to three July 2025 executive orders on data-center permitting, export promotion, and procurement neutrality. The European Union completed the AI Act, initiated staged application in 2025, and issued a code of practice for general-purpose AI. China consolidated domestic controls on public-facing generative AI and launched a Global AI Governance Action Plan with United Nations-centered cooperation, standards work, and capacity-building. The UK continued a regulator-led, assurance-first model. This essay compares these trajectories and distils implications for libraries: stronger accountability in procurement and vendor management; lawful, well-described training data; the publication of assessment artifacts; and AI literacy as a core service. The analysis highlights convergence on safety, transparency, and inclusion, alongside divergence in regulatory technique and international posture, which will shape library strategy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251384915
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence regulation matures: Landscapes of the USA, European Union, and China

Leo S. Lo
IFLA Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Artificial intelligence regulation matures: Landscapes of the USA, European Union, and China

Leo S. Lo
article en

Abstract

Between 2023 and July 2025, artificial intelligence (AI) governance in the USA, European Union, and China shifted from programmatic statements to actionable instruments. The USA moved from Executive Order 14110 to three July 2025 executive orders on data-center permitting, export promotion, and procurement neutrality. The European Union completed the AI Act, initiated staged application in 2025, and issued a code of practice for general-purpose AI. China consolidated domestic controls on public-facing generative AI and launched a Global AI Governance Action Plan with United Nations-centered cooperation, standards work, and capacity-building. The UK continued a regulator-led, assurance-first model. This essay compares these trajectories and distils implications for libraries: stronger accountability in procurement and vendor management; lawful, well-described training data; the publication of assessment artifacts; and AI literacy as a core service. The analysis highlights convergence on safety, transparency, and inclusion, alongside divergence in regulatory technique and international posture, which will shape library strategy.

IFLA Journal
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.