Jailbreak of the Imagination: Anthropology and the Practice of Abolition

Rooted in the freedom dreams of Black political movements across diasporas, abolition has emerged as a framework for the study and practice of building a world without captivity. Anthropologists of social movements have attended to the dreamers and destroyers doing this work, turning an analytic eye to the practice of abolition among community organizers, high school students, immigrant rights advocates, and queer activists. As the discipline flails for relevance, anthropologists writing from some of the most prestigious enclaves have called for its destruction. Both abolitionist anthropology and the abolition of anthropology itself have surfaced as rejoinders to the deraced humanism that dominated the last century of American anthropology. In this review, we engage abolition as a political horizon, a targeted decarceration movement, an ecological struggle, a mode of healing, and a pedagogical framework. Ultimately, we conceptualize abolition as an ecumenical imperative that both exceeds and inspires anthropological practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-082423-120003
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Jailbreak of the Imagination: Anthropology and the Practice of Abolition

B. Williams, Savannah Shange, Symone A. Johnson, Ashanté M. Reese
Annual Review of Anthropology
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Jailbreak of the Imagination: Anthropology and the Practice of Abolition

B. Williams, Savannah Shange, Symone A. Johnson, Ashanté M. Reese
article en

Abstract

Rooted in the freedom dreams of Black political movements across diasporas, abolition has emerged as a framework for the study and practice of building a world without captivity. Anthropologists of social movements have attended to the dreamers and destroyers doing this work, turning an analytic eye to the practice of abolition among community organizers, high school students, immigrant rights advocates, and queer activists. As the discipline flails for relevance, anthropologists writing from some of the most prestigious enclaves have called for its destruction. Both abolitionist anthropology and the abolition of anthropology itself have surfaced as rejoinders to the deraced humanism that dominated the last century of American anthropology. In this review, we engage abolition as a political horizon, a targeted decarceration movement, an ecological struggle, a mode of healing, and a pedagogical framework. Ultimately, we conceptualize abolition as an ecumenical imperative that both exceeds and inspires anthropological practice.

Annual Review of AnthropologyVol. 54(1)
Bowdoin College (US), University of California, Santa Cruz (US), African Studies Association (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.