Intraoperative Navigation in Orthognathic Surgery: Mitigating Iatrogenic Complications

Orthognathic surgery requires precise manipulation of skeletal structures in close proximity to highly sensitive nerve, vascular, and airway anatomy. Rare iatrogenic injuries including hemorrhage and neurovascular compromise are reported and can have devastating sequelae including stroke, blindness, and death. Established technologies have primarily focused on positional accuracy rather than enhancing patient safety. This review investigates the adoption of intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery to reduce the risk of iatrogenic complications. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify original studies reporting on the application and outcomes of intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery. Data were extracted on indications, surgical procedures, navigation technologies, primary purpose for use, and outcomes. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, and most were published after 2015 (63.3%). The majority (96.7%) used navigation to enhance accuracy of skeletal segment positioning; only 6.7% of studies reported use of intraoperative navigation to identify and avoid critical anatomic structures. BrainLab systems were most frequently used (40.0%), followed by Stryker (13.3%) and Aurora/Northern Digital Inc. (10.0%). Extensive evidence across multiple surgical specialties validates the efficacy of intraoperative navigation in reducing injury to critical structures and in limiting blood loss, operative time, and reoperation rates. Current literature supports intraoperative navigation as a highly accurate modality for orthognathic surgery but rarely addresses its potential to mitigate severe iatrogenic complications. Evidence from other surgical disciplines substantiates its role in enhancing safety, underscoring the need for high-level studies focused on complication prevention in orthognathic surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012107
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraoperative Navigation in Orthognathic Surgery: Mitigating Iatrogenic Complications

Bilal F. Hamzeh, Brooke French, Jason W. Yu, David Y. Khechoyan et al.
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Intraoperative Navigation in Orthognathic Surgery: Mitigating Iatrogenic Complications

Bilal F. Hamzeh, Brooke French, Jason W. Yu, David Y. Khechoyan, Phuong D. Nguyen, David Woodbridge Mathes, Anna D. Lee
article en

Abstract

Orthognathic surgery requires precise manipulation of skeletal structures in close proximity to highly sensitive nerve, vascular, and airway anatomy. Rare iatrogenic injuries including hemorrhage and neurovascular compromise are reported and can have devastating sequelae including stroke, blindness, and death. Established technologies have primarily focused on positional accuracy rather than enhancing patient safety. This review investigates the adoption of intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery to reduce the risk of iatrogenic complications. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted to identify original studies reporting on the application and outcomes of intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery. Data were extracted on indications, surgical procedures, navigation technologies, primary purpose for use, and outcomes. Thirty studies met inclusion criteria, and most were published after 2015 (63.3%). The majority (96.7%) used navigation to enhance accuracy of skeletal segment positioning; only 6.7% of studies reported use of intraoperative navigation to identify and avoid critical anatomic structures. BrainLab systems were most frequently used (40.0%), followed by Stryker (13.3%) and Aurora/Northern Digital Inc. (10.0%). Extensive evidence across multiple surgical specialties validates the efficacy of intraoperative navigation in reducing injury to critical structures and in limiting blood loss, operative time, and reoperation rates. Current literature supports intraoperative navigation as a highly accurate modality for orthognathic surgery but rarely addresses its potential to mitigate severe iatrogenic complications. Evidence from other surgical disciplines substantiates its role in enhancing safety, underscoring the need for high-level studies focused on complication prevention in orthognathic surgery.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 37(3/4)
NYU Langone Health (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.