Toward a Symposium on Conversion

Abstract The editor of Common Knowledge calls for papers on conversion — religious conversion, its ironies, inconsistencies, and even its logical possibility, as well as more or less sudden radical changes in worldview or philosophical orientation. Case studies on the distinction between conversion and what A. D. Nock calls adhesion are invited; likewise essays on the process that David Brown in a recent book calls “learning from other religions” — learning from, rather than converting to. The editor says he assumes that the likeliest criticism of this call for papers will be regarding its encouraging syncretism or too much “imaginative openness,” which, according to a reviewer of Brown's book, can become “an exercise in cherry-picking” that extracts “doctrines and practices from their traditional frameworks.” The journal therefore invites proposals for essays supporting, as well as papers rejecting, syncretism, “imaginative openness,” and cherry-picking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Common Knowledge
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754x-11783484
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Symposium on Conversion

Jeffrey M. Perl
Common Knowledge
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Toward a Symposium on Conversion

Jeffrey M. Perl
article en

Abstract

Abstract The editor of Common Knowledge calls for papers on conversion — religious conversion, its ironies, inconsistencies, and even its logical possibility, as well as more or less sudden radical changes in worldview or philosophical orientation. Case studies on the distinction between conversion and what A. D. Nock calls adhesion are invited; likewise essays on the process that David Brown in a recent book calls “learning from other religions” — learning from, rather than converting to. The editor says he assumes that the likeliest criticism of this call for papers will be regarding its encouraging syncretism or too much “imaginative openness,” which, according to a reviewer of Brown's book, can become “an exercise in cherry-picking” that extracts “doctrines and practices from their traditional frameworks.” The journal therefore invites proposals for essays supporting, as well as papers rejecting, syncretism, “imaginative openness,” and cherry-picking.

Common KnowledgeVol. 31(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.