Connecting rising electric vehicle demand to potential land use impacts and threats to biodiversity near key lithium mines

Electric vehicles (EVs) are a viable technology for reducing global transportation emissions; however, EV battery minerals, including lithium, are obtained through mining projects that can cause land use change, habitat loss, and pollution, threatening local biodiversity. As EV demand expands rapidly in the coming decades, these threats could be exacerbated. Here, we aim to quantify potential land use change (in km<sup>2</sup>) and biodiversity threats (in species-richness &amp; species-rarity weighted km<sup>2</sup> or ‘SRR-km<sup>2</sup>’) near ten major global lithium mines (three brine, seven hard rock) by 2040 that could arise from increased EV adoption to meet net zero goals. The land use change analysis suggests that brine mines are significantly more land intensive than hard rock mines, with the brine mines encompassing ∼80%–90% of the ten mines’ total land use footprint and having an average lithium land use intensity of ∼0.50 km<sup>2</sup>/kt Li<sub>cumulative, 2040</sub>, compared to ∼0.055 km<sup>2</sup>/kt Li<sub>cumulative, 2040</sub> for hard rock mines (∼10 times greater). Biodiversity threat analysis revealed that mines simultaneously with large land use footprints and located in regions of high species richness and/or rarity pose the greatest threats to surrounding ecosystems. The hard rock and brine extraction methods’ lithium biodiversity threat intensity is comparable (∼55–60 SRR-km<sup>2</sup>/kt Li<sub>cumulative, 2040</sub>), indicating a similar biodiversity threat when considering the net effect of mine land use footprint, species characteristics, and lithium production rate. Ultimately, while the SRR-km<sup>2</sup> metric is a useful first-order indicator, its sole reliance on land use, species richness, and species rarity leads to an incomplete assessment of lithium mining’s ecological risks. Future work should involve incorporating additional parameters, particularly ecotoxicity, to develop a comprehensive biodiversity threat assessment framework for lithium and other battery mineral mines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2977-3504/ae158a
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Connecting rising electric vehicle demand to potential land use impacts and threats to biodiversity near key lithium mines

John Mumford, Jacqueline Edge, Shyam S. Sharma
Sustainability Science and Technology
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
article

Connecting rising electric vehicle demand to potential land use impacts and threats to biodiversity near key lithium mines

John Mumford, Jacqueline Edge, Shyam S. Sharma
article en

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are a viable technology for reducing global transportation emissions; however, EV battery minerals, including lithium, are obtained through mining projects that can cause land use change, habitat loss, and pollution, threatening local biodiversity. As EV demand expands rapidly in the coming decades, these threats could be exacerbated. Here, we aim to quantify potential land use change (in km<sup>2</sup>) and biodiversity threats (in species-richness &amp; species-rarity weighted km<sup>2</sup> or ‘SRR-km<sup>2</sup>’) near ten major global lithium mines (three brine, seven hard rock) by 2040 that could arise from increased EV adoption to meet net zero goals. The land use change analysis suggests that brine mines are significantly more land intensive than hard rock mines, with the brine mines encompassing ∼80%–90% of the ten mines’ total land use footprint and having an average lithium land use intensity of ∼0.50 km<sup>2</sup>/kt Li<sub>cumulative, 2040</sub>, compared to ∼0.055 km<sup>2</sup>/kt Li<sub>cumulative, 2040</sub> for hard rock mines (∼10 times greater). Biodiversity threat analysis revealed that mines simultaneously with large land use footprints and located in regions of high species richness and/or rarity pose the greatest threats to surrounding ecosystems. The hard rock and brine extraction methods’ lithium biodiversity threat intensity is comparable (∼55–60 SRR-km<sup>2</sup>/kt Li<sub>cumulative, 2040</sub>), indicating a similar biodiversity threat when considering the net effect of mine land use footprint, species characteristics, and lithium production rate. Ultimately, while the SRR-km<sup>2</sup> metric is a useful first-order indicator, its sole reliance on land use, species richness, and species rarity leads to an incomplete assessment of lithium mining’s ecological risks. Future work should involve incorporating additional parameters, particularly ecotoxicity, to develop a comprehensive biodiversity threat assessment framework for lithium and other battery mineral mines.

Sustainability Science and TechnologyVol. 2(4)
Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.