“I believe it’s incredibly difficult to fight against this flood of spam”: Towards enhancing strategies for creating effective vulnerability notifications

Identifying the most effective and scalable methods for notifying website owners about compromises or vulnerabilities remains an enduring challenge. Although some success factors have been identified, results regarding effective senders and notification framing are often inconsistent, and the understanding of how recipients perceive vulnerability notifications is still limited. Heading towards a better understanding, we conducted a 3 × 3 randomized controlled notification experiment, examining the impact of three distinct senders and three variations of notification framings for n=581 compromised German websites. Our findings revealed a promising trend: receiving any notification significantly increased remediation compared to the absence of one. Remarkably, the choice of sender and framing played only a minor role in our notification experiment, which underscores the importance of notifying compromised websites and should motivate those who find vulnerabilities to take action. Yet, despite these encouraging results, a staggering 58% of the notified websites failed to remediate. To delve deeper into this phenomenon, we conducted follow-up interviews with 42 website owners who did not remediate their websites. The insights were revealing: while our notifications were delivered, many interviewees admitted they either overlooked or dismissed them as spam. This pattern persisted across different senders and framings, highlighting a critical challenge for future notification campaigns. Moving forward, future research should focus on finding ways to cut through the overwhelming amount of daily “spam” and explore strategies for how notifications can effectively convey their importance in recipients’ inboxes. Exploring strategies to raise the general awareness for cybersecurity, encouraging website owners to provide a security.txt, or providing additional assistance in the form of a self-service tool, are some proposals to increase remediation rates. We further recommend that future work should consider theories from communication science or psychology, e.g., Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) or the Elaboration-Likelihood Model, when designing notification campaigns.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Security
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2025.104682
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“I believe it’s incredibly difficult to fight against this flood of spam”: Towards enhancing strategies for creating effective vulnerability notifications

Fabian Neusser, Peter Mayer, Dominik Herrmann, Anne Hennig et al.
Computers & Security
Information and Cyber Security
article

“I believe it’s incredibly difficult to fight against this flood of spam”: Towards enhancing strategies for creating effective vulnerability notifications

Fabian Neusser, Peter Mayer, Dominik Herrmann, Anne Hennig, Maxime Fabian Veit, Leoni Schmidt-Enke
article en

Abstract

Identifying the most effective and scalable methods for notifying website owners about compromises or vulnerabilities remains an enduring challenge. Although some success factors have been identified, results regarding effective senders and notification framing are often inconsistent, and the understanding of how recipients perceive vulnerability notifications is still limited. Heading towards a better understanding, we conducted a 3 × 3 randomized controlled notification experiment, examining the impact of three distinct senders and three variations of notification framings for n=581 compromised German websites. Our findings revealed a promising trend: receiving any notification significantly increased remediation compared to the absence of one. Remarkably, the choice of sender and framing played only a minor role in our notification experiment, which underscores the importance of notifying compromised websites and should motivate those who find vulnerabilities to take action. Yet, despite these encouraging results, a staggering 58% of the notified websites failed to remediate. To delve deeper into this phenomenon, we conducted follow-up interviews with 42 website owners who did not remediate their websites. The insights were revealing: while our notifications were delivered, many interviewees admitted they either overlooked or dismissed them as spam. This pattern persisted across different senders and framings, highlighting a critical challenge for future notification campaigns. Moving forward, future research should focus on finding ways to cut through the overwhelming amount of daily “spam” and explore strategies for how notifications can effectively convey their importance in recipients’ inboxes. Exploring strategies to raise the general awareness for cybersecurity, encouraging website owners to provide a security.txt, or providing additional assistance in the form of a self-service tool, are some proposals to increase remediation rates. We further recommend that future work should consider theories from communication science or psychology, e.g., Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) or the Elaboration-Likelihood Model, when designing notification campaigns.

Computers & SecurityVol. 160
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.