Modeling Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Interactions by the <scp>ClusPro</scp> Team in <scp>CASP16</scp>

In the CASP16 experiment, our team employed hybrid computational strategies to predict both protein-protein and protein-ligand complex structures. For protein-protein docking, we combined physics-based sampling-using ClusPro FFT docking and molecular dynamics-with AlphaFold (AF)-based sampling, followed by AF-based refinement. Our method produced numerous high-accuracy complex models, including cases where AF alone failed, underscoring the critical role of physics-based sampling alongside deep learning-based refinement. For protein-ligand docking, we integrated the ClusPro LigTBM template-based approach with a machine learning-based confidence model for rescoring. The method preserves conserved interaction fragments derived from homologous complexes, followed by local resampling using physics-based sampling and a diffusion model. Our template-based strategy achieved a mean lDDT-PLI of 0.69 across 233 targets, which was highly competitive. These results demonstrate that combining physics-based modeling with AI-driven refinement can significantly enhance the accuracy of both protein-protein and protein-ligand structure predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.70066
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Interactions by the ClusPro Team in CASP16

Dmitri Beglov, Ken A. Dill, Xin Cao, Omeir Khan et al.
7 citations
Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
Protein Structure and Dynamics
5.64
article

Modeling Protein–Protein and Protein–Ligand Interactions by the ClusPro Team in CASP16

Dmitri Beglov, Ken A. Dill, Xin Cao, Omeir Khan, Dzmitry Padhorny, Y. Zhu, Ryota Ashizawa, Sándor Vajda, Stan Xiaogang Li, Kushal Koirala, George Jones, Carlos L. Simmerling, Sergei Kotelnikov, Dima Kozakov, Diane Joseph‐McCarthy, Evangelos A. Coutsias, Darya Stepanenko, Alexander Tropsha, Ernest Glukhov, Dmytro Kalitin, Ayse A. Bekar-Cesaretli, Veranika Averkava, Maria Lazou, Yu Hao, Mark Lukin, T. Patsahan, Derara Hailegeorgis
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In the CASP16 experiment, our team employed hybrid computational strategies to predict both protein-protein and protein-ligand complex structures. For protein-protein docking, we combined physics-based sampling-using ClusPro FFT docking and molecular dynamics-with AlphaFold (AF)-based sampling, followed by AF-based refinement. Our method produced numerous high-accuracy complex models, including cases where AF alone failed, underscoring the critical role of physics-based sampling alongside deep learning-based refinement. For protein-ligand docking, we integrated the ClusPro LigTBM template-based approach with a machine learning-based confidence model for rescoring. The method preserves conserved interaction fragments derived from homologous complexes, followed by local resampling using physics-based sampling and a diffusion model. Our template-based strategy achieved a mean lDDT-PLI of 0.69 across 233 targets, which was highly competitive. These results demonstrate that combining physics-based modeling with AI-driven refinement can significantly enhance the accuracy of both protein-protein and protein-ligand structure predictions.

Proteins Structure Function and BioinformaticsVol. 94(1)
Boston University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Simons Foundation (US), Yukhnovskii Institute for Condensed Matter Physics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA), New York University (US), Stony Brook University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Lviv Polytechnic National University (UA)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.