Stock liquidity and price‑to‑book discounts: non‑linear evidence from European‑listed firms

• Stock liquidity has a convex (non-linear) effect on the price-to-book ratio. • Illiquidity discount is pronounced for value stocks but negligible for glamour firms. • Results support accounting for liquidity in valuation models and regulatory policy. We test whether liquidity alters valuation asymmetrically across European equities in the period 2001 to 2023. Our findings reveal a convex pattern: a one‑standard‑deviation rise in illiquidity lowers the price‑to‑book ratio by 3 % in the bottom decile but becomes immaterial above the 90th percentile. Specifically, for firms with lower price/book ratios, higher trading volume acts as a mechanism that depresses even further stock pricing, suggesting a negative investor sentiment. Results imply that comparable‑multiple models, liquidity‑based regulation and distressed‑equity screens should all be conditioned on market depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance research letters
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108750
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stock liquidity and price‑to‑book discounts: non‑linear evidence from European‑listed firms

Víctor Barros, Tiago Gonçalves
Finance research letters
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

Stock liquidity and price‑to‑book discounts: non‑linear evidence from European‑listed firms

Víctor Barros, Tiago Gonçalves
article en

Abstract

• Stock liquidity has a convex (non-linear) effect on the price-to-book ratio. • Illiquidity discount is pronounced for value stocks but negligible for glamour firms. • Results support accounting for liquidity in valuation models and regulatory policy. We test whether liquidity alters valuation asymmetrically across European equities in the period 2001 to 2023. Our findings reveal a convex pattern: a one‑standard‑deviation rise in illiquidity lowers the price‑to‑book ratio by 3 % in the bottom decile but becomes immaterial above the 90th percentile. Specifically, for firms with lower price/book ratios, higher trading volume acts as a mechanism that depresses even further stock pricing, suggesting a negative investor sentiment. Results imply that comparable‑multiple models, liquidity‑based regulation and distressed‑equity screens should all be conditioned on market depth.

Finance research lettersVol. 86
University of Lisbon (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.