Missense variants in human forkhead transcription factors reveal determinants of forkhead DNA bispecificity

Recognition of specific DNA sequences by transcription factors (TFs) is a key step in transcriptional control of gene expression. While most forkhead (FH) TFs bind either an FKH (RYAAAYA) or an FHL (GACGC) recognition motif, some FHs can bind both motifs. Mechanisms that control whether an FH is monospecific vs. bispecific have remained unknown. Screening a library of 12 reference FH proteins, 61 naturally occurring missense variants including clinical variants, and 22 designed mutant FHs for DNA-binding activity using universal ("all 10-mer") protein-binding microarrays revealed non-DNA-contacting residues that control mono- vs. bispecificity. Variation in non-DNA-contacting amino acid residues of TFs is associated with human traits and may play a role in the evolution of TF DNA-binding activities and gene regulatory networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cell Reports
Published
2025-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2025.116427
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missense variants in human forkhead transcription factors reveal determinants of forkhead DNA bispecificity

Raehoon Jeong, Martha L. Bulyk, Stephen S. Gisselbrecht, Jessica King et al.
1 citations
Cell Reports
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
0.81
article

Missense variants in human forkhead transcription factors reveal determinants of forkhead DNA bispecificity

Raehoon Jeong, Martha L. Bulyk, Stephen S. Gisselbrecht, Jessica King, Julie‐Alexia Dias, Elisabeth Rothman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Recognition of specific DNA sequences by transcription factors (TFs) is a key step in transcriptional control of gene expression. While most forkhead (FH) TFs bind either an FKH (RYAAAYA) or an FHL (GACGC) recognition motif, some FHs can bind both motifs. Mechanisms that control whether an FH is monospecific vs. bispecific have remained unknown. Screening a library of 12 reference FH proteins, 61 naturally occurring missense variants including clinical variants, and 22 designed mutant FHs for DNA-binding activity using universal ("all 10-mer") protein-binding microarrays revealed non-DNA-contacting residues that control mono- vs. bispecificity. Variation in non-DNA-contacting amino acid residues of TFs is associated with human traits and may play a role in the evolution of TF DNA-binding activities and gene regulatory networks.

Cell ReportsVol. 44(11)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Missense variants in human forkhead transcription factors reveal determinants of forkhead DNA bispecificity — Raehoon Jeong, Martha L. Bulyk, et al. · Cell Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS