Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Opportunities, Barriers, and Ethical Considerations From Multi‐Disciplinary Focus Groups

This study highlighted the potential and complexity of integrating AI into eating disorder care from the viewpoint of eating disorder and AI professionals. While there is value in AI in improving efficiency and clinical support, successful implementation requires addressing ethical concerns, legal uncertainty, and infrastructural barriers. Collaboration across disciplines, rigorous validation, and clinician involvement are essential to ensure that AI applications are safe, meaningful, and ethically sound.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24579
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Opportunities, Barriers, and Ethical Considerations From Multi‐Disciplinary Focus Groups

S. Franssen, Estefanía Talavera, C.M.J.M. Vreeswijk, Alexandra E. Dingemans et al.
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Opportunities, Barriers, and Ethical Considerations From Multi‐Disciplinary Focus Groups

S. Franssen, Estefanía Talavera, C.M.J.M. Vreeswijk, Alexandra E. Dingemans, M Landt, Joyce Maas, Milan Petković, Mladena Simeunovic-Ostojic, Sebastian Cardona Cano, A. M. van Oosterzee
article en

Abstract

This study highlighted the potential and complexity of integrating AI into eating disorder care from the viewpoint of eating disorder and AI professionals. While there is value in AI in improving efficiency and clinical support, successful implementation requires addressing ethical concerns, legal uncertainty, and infrastructural barriers. Collaboration across disciplines, rigorous validation, and clinician involvement are essential to ensure that AI applications are safe, meaningful, and ethically sound.

International Journal of Eating DisordersVol. 59(2)
NXP (Netherlands) (NL), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), Tilburg University (NL), GGZ Rivierduinen (NL), GGZ Oost Brabant (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Twente (NL)
ITEA, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Artificial Intelligence in Eating Disorder Treatment: A Qualitative Analysis of Clinical Opportunities, Barriers, and Ethical Considerations From Multi‐Disciplinary Focus Groups — S. Franssen, Estefanía Talavera, et al. · International Journal of Eating Disorders (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS