Perceptions and achievement of engineering undergraduates using peer review in group sessions to improve their report writing skills

Engineers must communicate effectively through written reports, yet undergraduates often struggle to develop these skills. Successful teaching approaches typically involve iterative writing activities and associated feedback, but these can create heavy workloads for staff and depend on students’ ability to use feedback effectively. This project embedded writing skills development into a first-year laboratory skills unit by having students provide peer feedback on several formative partial reports. Implementing peer feedback can be challenging, particularly obtaining student acceptance of an unfamiliar learning technique. The project therefore explored student perceptions of peer feedback and investigated whether engagement with the process affected achievement. Results indicated that students recognised the benefits of peer feedback but lacked confidence when providing it. Higher engagement with formative feedback-related tasks improved pass rates. Embedding peer review within teaching can enhance students’ writing skills if supported by structured training, with improved performance providing extrinsic motivation to students to participate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Engineering Education
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2574551
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions and achievement of engineering undergraduates using peer review in group sessions to improve their report writing skills

Sean Lancastle, R K Selwyn, Joel Ross
European Journal of Engineering Education
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

Perceptions and achievement of engineering undergraduates using peer review in group sessions to improve their report writing skills

Sean Lancastle, R K Selwyn, Joel Ross
article en

Abstract

Engineers must communicate effectively through written reports, yet undergraduates often struggle to develop these skills. Successful teaching approaches typically involve iterative writing activities and associated feedback, but these can create heavy workloads for staff and depend on students’ ability to use feedback effectively. This project embedded writing skills development into a first-year laboratory skills unit by having students provide peer feedback on several formative partial reports. Implementing peer feedback can be challenging, particularly obtaining student acceptance of an unfamiliar learning technique. The project therefore explored student perceptions of peer feedback and investigated whether engagement with the process affected achievement. Results indicated that students recognised the benefits of peer feedback but lacked confidence when providing it. Higher engagement with formative feedback-related tasks improved pass rates. Embedding peer review within teaching can enhance students’ writing skills if supported by structured training, with improved performance providing extrinsic motivation to students to participate.

European Journal of Engineering Education
University of Bristol (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.