Chemical strengthening of float glasses: Effect of composition and structure

Abstract Two silicate float glasses were considered in the present work: a typical clear soda lime silicate glass and a soda magnesia silicate glass. Both materials underwent chemical strengthening in KNO 3 , and a different behavior was pointed out in terms of potassium penetration and corresponding surface compression. The soda magnesia silicate glass demonstrated a significantly higher propensity for reinforcement through the exchange of sodium with potassium owing to a much higher interdiffusion coefficient, although the activation energy for the process was substantially identical for the two materials. The difference in performance in terms of Na/K exchange can be only partially correlated to the slightly larger amount of sodium in the soda‐magnesia silicate glass, which is instead characterized by a more open structure, richer in five‐, six‐membered or larger rings, as revealed by NMR and FT‐IR/micro‐Raman spectroscopy. This structural difference appears to be dictated by the chemical composition of the glasses, soda magnesia silicate material being richer in network formers such as silica, alumina, and, very likely, magnesia, which causes the presence of more abundant Q 3 units and more limited Q 2 and Q 4 ones for a faster movement of the alkaline atoms within the structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.70317
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Glass properties and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemical strengthening of float glasses: Effect of composition and structure

Vincenzo M. Sglavo, Sandra Dirè, Paolo Bettotti, Emanuela Callone
1 citations
Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Glass properties and applications
0.73
article

Chemical strengthening of float glasses: Effect of composition and structure

Vincenzo M. Sglavo, Sandra Dirè, Paolo Bettotti, Emanuela Callone
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Two silicate float glasses were considered in the present work: a typical clear soda lime silicate glass and a soda magnesia silicate glass. Both materials underwent chemical strengthening in KNO 3 , and a different behavior was pointed out in terms of potassium penetration and corresponding surface compression. The soda magnesia silicate glass demonstrated a significantly higher propensity for reinforcement through the exchange of sodium with potassium owing to a much higher interdiffusion coefficient, although the activation energy for the process was substantially identical for the two materials. The difference in performance in terms of Na/K exchange can be only partially correlated to the slightly larger amount of sodium in the soda‐magnesia silicate glass, which is instead characterized by a more open structure, richer in five‐, six‐membered or larger rings, as revealed by NMR and FT‐IR/micro‐Raman spectroscopy. This structural difference appears to be dictated by the chemical composition of the glasses, soda magnesia silicate material being richer in network formers such as silica, alumina, and, very likely, magnesia, which causes the presence of more abundant Q 3 units and more limited Q 2 and Q 4 ones for a faster movement of the alkaline atoms within the structure.

Journal of the American Ceramic SocietyVol. 109(1)
University of Trento (IT), Istituto di Fotonica e Nanotecnologie (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Glass properties and applications
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.