Experimental and Theoretical Branch Point Energies in ZnO and MgO: A Comparison

Agreement is found between the experimentally and theoretically determined branch point level for ZnO located (2.7 ± 0.1) eV above the valence band maximum. This result is obtained on the basis of a combined study where its experimental position is extracted from temperature‐dependent capacitance versus voltage measurements on AZO/n‐Zn (1− x ) Mg x O:Al/SiO x /p‐Si heterostructures with Mg content equal to ≈0.07 and ≈0.23 combined with transmission electron microscopy and ellipsometry measurements to assess the SiO x interlayer contribution. This analysis confirms the values previously published in Schifano et al. J. Appl. Phys. 136 , 245304 (2024). In contrast, density‐functional theory calculations are used for obtaining the theoretical estimates. A similar comparison, in the MgO case, reveals a difference of ≈0.6 eV between the theoretically predicted and experimentally obtained values placed (4.3 ± 0.1) and (3.7 ± 0.4) eV above the valence band maximum, respectively. In this case, the assumption of a linear variation of the ZnMgO branch‐point level between the two binary compounds, ZnO and MgO, used for the extraction of the experimental value, is among the probable causes of the residual difference found. Overall, the presented results indicate that the whole set of p (O) related valence bands should be included for a precise determination of the branch point energies if ab‐initio methods are used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.202500342
Primary Topic
ZnO doping and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental and Theoretical Branch Point Energies in ZnO and MgO: A Comparison

R. Schifano, O. Volniańska, John B. Kurek, Ł. Wachnicki et al.
physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters
ZnO doping and properties
article

Experimental and Theoretical Branch Point Energies in ZnO and MgO: A Comparison

R. Schifano, O. Volniańska, John B. Kurek, Ł. Wachnicki, Annett Thøgersen, I. Miloushev, Sylwia Gierałtowska, U. Rehman, B.S. Witkowski, Daryna Budiakivska
article en

Abstract

Agreement is found between the experimentally and theoretically determined branch point level for ZnO located (2.7 ± 0.1) eV above the valence band maximum. This result is obtained on the basis of a combined study where its experimental position is extracted from temperature‐dependent capacitance versus voltage measurements on AZO/n‐Zn (1− x ) Mg x O:Al/SiO x /p‐Si heterostructures with Mg content equal to ≈0.07 and ≈0.23 combined with transmission electron microscopy and ellipsometry measurements to assess the SiO x interlayer contribution. This analysis confirms the values previously published in Schifano et al. J. Appl. Phys. 136 , 245304 (2024). In contrast, density‐functional theory calculations are used for obtaining the theoretical estimates. A similar comparison, in the MgO case, reveals a difference of ≈0.6 eV between the theoretically predicted and experimentally obtained values placed (4.3 ± 0.1) and (3.7 ± 0.4) eV above the valence band maximum, respectively. In this case, the assumption of a linear variation of the ZnMgO branch‐point level between the two binary compounds, ZnO and MgO, used for the extraction of the experimental value, is among the probable causes of the residual difference found. Overall, the presented results indicate that the whole set of p (O) related valence bands should be included for a precise determination of the branch point energies if ab‐initio methods are used.

physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research LettersVol. 19(11)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), SINTEF (NO), Georgi Nadjakov Institute of Solid State Physics (BG), Institute of Electron Technology (PL), Vigo System (Poland) (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
ZnO doping and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.