High‐Rate FA‐Based Co‐Evaporated Perovskites: Understanding Rate Limitations and Practical Considerations to Overcome Their Impact

Abstract Vapor phase deposition methods are readily able to achieve uniform coverage of large‐area substrates and are widely considered promising for industrial‐scale perovskite solar cell fabrication. However, as perovskite‐silicon tandem solar cells approach commercialization, practical considerations of manufacturing throughput come into play. Here, it is shown that the inherent sublimation characteristics of the organic precursor formamidinium iodide (FAI) make increasing the deposition rate of FA‐based co‐evaporated perovskites negatively impact replicability and lead to a substantial decrease in power conversion efficiency (PCE). These losses are linked to reduced film homogeneity and the emergence of carbon‐rich regions within the perovskite layer. To mitigate these rate‐induced effects, two approaches are explored: source layout optimization and material preconditioning. Utilizing dual FAI sources rather than a single FAI source reduces the relative PCE drop from ≈23% rel to ≈9% rel at a deposition rate of ≈18 nm min −1 (14.8% PCE @ maximum power point (MPP)) compared to the baseline rate of 5 nm min −1 (16.2% PCE @MPP). Alternatively, preconditioning a single FAI source reduces the performance losses from ≈31% rel to ≈26% rel at a deposition rate of ≈21 nm min −1 . These findings underscore the importance of tailored source strategies to enable high‐rate FA‐based co‐evaporated perovskites without compromising device performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Functional Materials
Published
2025-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202517873
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Perovskite Materials and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High‐Rate FA‐Based Co‐Evaporated Perovskites: Understanding Rate Limitations and Practical Considerations to Overcome Their Impact

Stefanie Severin, Roja Singh, Lars Korte, Viktor Škorjanc et al.
3 citations
Advanced Functional Materials
Perovskite Materials and Applications
2.19
article

High‐Rate FA‐Based Co‐Evaporated Perovskites: Understanding Rate Limitations and Practical Considerations to Overcome Their Impact

Stefanie Severin, Roja Singh, Lars Korte, Viktor Škorjanc, Marcel Roß, Felix Laufer, Paul Faßl, Steve Albrecht, Suresh Maniyarasu, Thomas Feeney, Ulrich W. Paetzold, Julian Petry, Alexander Diercks, Aleksandra Miaskiewicz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Vapor phase deposition methods are readily able to achieve uniform coverage of large‐area substrates and are widely considered promising for industrial‐scale perovskite solar cell fabrication. However, as perovskite‐silicon tandem solar cells approach commercialization, practical considerations of manufacturing throughput come into play. Here, it is shown that the inherent sublimation characteristics of the organic precursor formamidinium iodide (FAI) make increasing the deposition rate of FA‐based co‐evaporated perovskites negatively impact replicability and lead to a substantial decrease in power conversion efficiency (PCE). These losses are linked to reduced film homogeneity and the emergence of carbon‐rich regions within the perovskite layer. To mitigate these rate‐induced effects, two approaches are explored: source layout optimization and material preconditioning. Utilizing dual FAI sources rather than a single FAI source reduces the relative PCE drop from ≈23% rel to ≈9% rel at a deposition rate of ≈18 nm min −1 (14.8% PCE @ maximum power point (MPP)) compared to the baseline rate of 5 nm min −1 (16.2% PCE @MPP). Alternatively, preconditioning a single FAI source reduces the performance losses from ≈31% rel to ≈26% rel at a deposition rate of ≈21 nm min −1 . These findings underscore the importance of tailored source strategies to enable high‐rate FA‐based co‐evaporated perovskites without compromising device performance.

Advanced Functional MaterialsVol. 36(16)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
European Commission, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Helmholtz Energy Materials Foundry, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Perovskite Materials and Applications
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.